The IRS Could Owe You Money Thanks to a Pandemic-Era Court Ruling

4 min read

IRS Could Owe You Money, COVID Court RulingHere’s something that flew under the radar for most people: a court decision from late last year could put money back in your pocket if you got hit with IRS penalties during COVID. But you need to act fast! For some taxpayers, the deadline to file a claim is July 10.

What This Case Is Actually About

Remember when COVID was declared a federal disaster? That designation wasn’t just symbolic. It triggered real protections under the tax code, specifically Section 7508A, which lets the IRS push back deadlines and waive penalties when taxpayers are caught up in a disaster. We’re talking about failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties here, and those fees can add up to almost 50 percent of what you already owe, which is brutal!

The Kwong v. United States decision came down from the Court of Federal Claims in November 2025, and it changed the game. The court said the nationwide COVID emergency created a mandatory postponement running from Jan. 20, 2020, through July 10, 2023. Everything that came due in that window should have been bumped to July 11, 2023. In other words, a lot of people may have been penalized when they shouldn’t have been.

This Got Real on April 30

The case had been percolating quietly until the National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA) made some noise about it on April 30. That’s when things got interesting. According to the NTA, tens of millions of taxpayers could be eligible for refunds. Not just on the penalties themselves, but on the interest that piled up on top of those penalties.

The NTA isn’t being shy about this either. The office has pushed hard for the IRS to apply relief broadly instead of making people jump through hoops. They want systemic fixes, not case-by-case battles. And they’ve asked Congress to make sure procedural red tape doesn’t rob people of money they are owed.

There’s another wrinkle worth knowing about. Some refunds issued during 2020 through 2023 may have shortchanged taxpayers on interest because the IRS treated their returns as late. If Kwong holds up, you might be able to claim that missing interest, too.

Expats Had It Especially Rough

If you were living overseas when the pandemic hit, you know the chaos was next level. Borders slammed shut with no warning. People got stranded in countries they were just passing through. Others couldn’t get back to the places they’d been living for years.

Good luck reaching your accountant when consulates are closed, mail isn’t moving, and you’re dealing with a 12-hour time zone difference. Some folks couldn’t access their bank accounts. Others couldn’t get basic documents. And plenty of people were simply stuck, unable to go anywhere, when their filing deadlines rolled around.

Slapping penalties on taxpayers who were dealing with all of that? It misses the point entirely. The disaster relief rules exist for exactly these situations. The NTA has been clear: fair treatment means recognizing what people were actually going through.

You Need to File a Protective Claim

Here’s the practical part. If you want to preserve your right to get this money back, you have to file something called a protective claim. Think of it as a placeholder that keeps your options open while the legal dust settles.

For many people, the deadline is July 10, 2026, though it depends on the tax year involved. Don’t wait until the last minute to figure this out.

The good news is the paperwork isn’t complicated. You can use IRS Form 843 or just file an amended return. You need to list the tax years you’re claiming and note that your refund depends on how the Kwong case plays out. You don’t have to calculate the exact dollar amount right now. The whole point is just to get yourself on record before time runs out.

A Few Limitations to Know About

This relief is specifically about federal income taxes under the Internal Revenue Code. If you’re worried about Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) penalties, that’s a different animal. FBARs fall under the Bank Secrecy Act, so Kwong doesn’t automatically help there. That said, you might still have a reasonable cause argument based on the same COVID disruptions.

State taxes? Every state did its own thing. Most offered some pandemic extensions, but those programs were separate and usually more limited than what we’re talking about here.

Conclusion

If there’s any chance this applies to you, file that protective claim now. Especially if you were overseas during the pandemic years. Once that deadline passes, the door closes for good.

Understanding Cost of Goods Manufactured

3 min read

Understanding Cost of Goods Manufactured, What is Cost of Goods Manufactured, what is COGMWhen it comes to the latest report for March 2026 manufactured goods orders, according to the United States Census Bureau’s May 4 report, the government agency reported a 1.5 percent bump in orders for the nation’s manufacturers, growing to $630.4 billion. Understanding concepts like Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM) is essential to smooth operations.

The cost of goods manufactured (COGM) reflects the total manufacturing costs a company incurs during a particular accounting period to complete goods. It includes direct materials used, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. COGM helps businesses manage inventory levels and serves as a key input for calculating the cost of goods sold (COGS) reported on the income statement.

COGM Formula:

The standard formula is:

COGM = Beginning Work-in-Process (WIP) Inventory + Total Manufacturing Costs – Ending Work-in-Process (WIP) inventory

Defined as:

Total Manufacturing Costs = Direct Materials Used + Direct Labor + Manufacturing Overhead

Hypothetical Example:

Based on the following numbers, the COGM would be calculated as follows:

  • Direct Materials Used: $200,000
  • Direct Labor: $75,000
  • Manufacturing (Production) Overhead: $120,000
  • Beginning WIP Inventory: $20,000
  • Ending WIP Inventory: $60,000

First, calculate Total Manufacturing Costs: $200,000 + $75,000 + $120,000 = $395,000

Then:

COGM = 20,000 + 395,000 – 60,000 = 355,000

So, the Cost of Goods Manufactured is $355,000.

Interpreting COGM:

The first step is to analyze how each input contributes to the result. This involves reviewing direct materials, direct labor, and overhead to determine the complete production costs for the accounting period. By evaluating each component’s contribution, companies can better project manufacturing capacity and cost-effectiveness.

Direct Materials Used in Production

Direct Materials Used = Beginning Raw Materials Inventory + Purchase of Raw Materials – Ending Raw Materials Inventory

This amount is then incorporated into the Total Manufacturing Costs (and ultimately the WIP inventory) shown above.

Calculating Direct Labor and Manufacturing Overhead:

Direct labor costs are determined from time logs or clock-ins (hours worked × hourly rate). Manufacturing overhead includes indirect production costs such as factory utilities, depreciation, and supervision.

Translating COGM to Cost of Goods Sold:

Once calculated, COGM is transferred to the Finished Goods Inventory account. Finished Goods Inventory consists of completed products ready for sale to customers. The standard relationship is:

COGS = Beginning Finished Goods Inventory + COGM – Ending Finished Goods Inventory

(or equivalently: Ending Finished Goods Inventory = Beginning Finished Goods Inventory + COGM – COGS)

Conclusion:

COGM shows whether production costs are too high or too low relative to sales. For example, if one business generates $2,000,000 in revenue with $1,500,000 in COGS (25% gross margin), while another has $1,500,000 in revenue but only $750,000 in COGS (50% gross margin), the second company demonstrates stronger profitability.

Understanding COGM enables businesses to optimize costs related to labor, overhead, and materials, ultimately improving net income and operational efficiency. When calculating and reporting COGM, it is essential for businesses to apply these concepts accurately in their accounting and bookkeeping practices.

Advancing Broadband, Tribal Land Mortgages and Affordable Single-Owner Housing Opportunities

3 min read

 Tribal Land MortgagesS.98: Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025 – This bipartisan bill instructs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a vetting process for service provider applicants applying for federal funding assistance for broadband deployment in high-cost areas, including rural communities. Sponsored by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) on Jan. 15, 2025, the bill passed in the Senate on June 26, 2025, and in the House on April 20, 2025. It was signed into law by the president on May 11, 2026.

S.723: Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025 – Introduced by Sen. John Thune (R-SD) on Feb. 25, 2025, this bill requires the Bureau of Indian Affairs to complete the processing of all residential and business mortgages on Indian land by certain deadlines. It passed in the Senate on Dec. 11, 2025, in the House on March 4, and was enacted on May 4.       

A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress (SJ Res 185) – Well past the 60-day deadline for a president to legally engage in military hostilities abroad without congressional authorization, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) introduced his resolution on April 27. The resolution would remove U.S. military troops from Iran unless explicitly authorized by Congress. On May 19, the resolution narrowly passed in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, now moving to the Senate floor for debate and a full vote. The resolution faces an uphill battle in the House. However, even if the joint resolution cleared the Senate and the House, it is expected to be vetoed by the president and would require a two-thirds supermajority by both the Senate and the House to override the veto – which is unlikely at this point.          

21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (HR 6644) – This bipartisan, White House-endorsed bill addresses housing affordability by placing ownership restrictions on large institutional investors and expanding available financing for homebuyers. One provision would prohibit institutional investors/private equity firms that own more than 350 single-family homes from purchasing additional single-family homes – unless they are sold to individual homeowners after seven years. The act would impose a penalty of up to $1 million per violation or three times the purchase price of the property, whichever is greater. Other provisions waive regulations on community banks to help expand local lending. The bill was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on Dec. 11, 2025. It passed in the House on Feb. 9, in the Senate with changes on March 12, and in the House again with changes on May 20. The bill is currently under consideration in the Senate for the second time.