How the 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act Impacted Accounting in 2023

3 min read

2022 Consolidated Appropriations ActAccording to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ report “Advancing Rural Health Equity,” the 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) maintained telehealth options due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) order for 151 more days beyond the original expiration of the Covid-19 PHE. Medicare recipients will benefit from the extension of telehealth services. This legislation will also permit Medicare to pay for telehealth services provided by Federally Qualified Health Centers and Rural Health Clinics.

The 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act extends, through 12/31/2024, the following telehealth flexibilities authorized during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Healthcare providers are permitted to bill Medicare for telehealth services regardless of Medicare patients’ residence. Examples of providers include audiologists, speech-language pathologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Telehealth coverage will also remain available for mental health services through 2024.

During March 2020, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) lengthened the Covid-19 Accelerated and Advance Payments (CAAP) Program to more medical suppliers under Part A and Part B. Such accelerated and advanced payments are remittances to both Part A and Part B providers in the case of interruptions to submissions and processing of claims. This can happen during man-made or natural disasters as a means to speed up cash flow to healthcare suppliers and providers. The CARES Act (P.L. 116-136) offers greater flexibility via increased time lines and payment sums through the expanded CAAP program for providers.

Based on the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021, and Other Extensions Act, while the CMS no longer accepts accelerated or advance payments, permitted providers will have repayment begin 12 months after each provider or supplier’s accelerated or advance payment is issued.

One important consideration when it comes to accounting for these types of transactions is party consideration. Primarily, these transactions involve more than simply the purchaser and merchant. When it comes to medical services, and especially Medicare and Medicaid, there’s the patient, the direct service provider (doctor, nurse, admin staff, etc.), the facility (in or out of network consideration), and the private or government-based administered entity. The point here is that when it comes to revenue recognition, there needs to be explicit delineation for which party delivers services to the patient (and when) and how each party recognizes revenue based on their arrangement(s) with the patient.  

As for recognizing revenue, the relationships between the patient and the different providers are important due to when the entities are able to recognize revenue — generally when the material/service/product is delivered/satisfied. This is where records are important to keep and analyze on the accounting end so there can be proper reconciliation as to when the product/service has been fulfilled and when it’s recognized by the appropriate entity for revenue recognition procedures.

While there’s no cut-and-dried method to account for the evolving way payments are made, it’s important to keep up with state and federal legislation. Always check with your accountant to stay current with the latest updates to these laws.

Expanding Benefits for Veterans and Extending Government Funding Until Jan. 19, 2024

3 min read

Expanding Benefits for Veterans and Extending Government Funding Until Jan. 19, 2024A bill to amend Title 38, United States Code, to extend and modify certain authorities and requirements relating to the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. (S 2795) – This bill was introduced on Sept. 13 by Sen. Don Tester (D-MT). This act extends various Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) programs and benefits, including extending the use of contract healthcare professions for disability exams from three to five years; extending authorization for VA emergency preparedness for public health emergencies through fiscal year 2028; and extending certain fee rates under the VA’s home loan program through Nov. 15, 2031. The bill passed in the Senate on Sept. 13, the House on Sept. 26, and was signed into law by the President on Oct. 6.

Wounded Warrior Access Act (HR 1226) – This bill requires the VA to develop and maintain a secure online website that will allow claimants to request records related to their VA claims and benefits, as well as a process for reporting violations. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) on Feb. 28. It passed in the House on March 7, the Senate on Nov. 2 and was signed into law on Nov. 13.

Korean American Valor Act (HR 366) – This act amends U.S. Code Title 38 to treat certain members of the armed forces of the Republic of Korea, who served in Vietnam under the Armed Forces of the United States, as veterans for purposes of qualifying for healthcare by the VA. The legislation was introduced on Jan. 13by Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA), and was passed in the House on May 22 and in the Senate on Oct. 19. The bill was enacted by President Biden on Nov. 13.

A bill to amend Title 38, United States Code, to strengthen benefits for children of Vietnam veterans born with spina bifida, and for other purposes. (S 12) – Introduced by Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) on Jan. 26, this bill requires the VA to provide healthcare, job training and monetary benefits to children of Vietnam veterans who were born with spina bifida – for the duration of the child’s life. The bill also requires the VA to establish an advisory council responsible for the care, coordination and ongoing outreach to assist with any care changes over time. The bill passed in the Senate on July 13, the House on Sept. 19, and was signed into law on Oct. 6.

Further Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2024 (HR 6363) – This continuing resolution (CR) was introduced by Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) on Nov. 13. It is part of a two-step process to continue funding most government programs and activities at fiscal year 2023 levels for the current fiscal year (2024). The CR expires on Jan. 19, 2024, by which time budget legislation will need to be passed in order to avoid a government shutdown. This CR passed in the House on Nov. 14, the Senate on Nov. 15, and was signed by the President on Nov. 16.

Wage Garnishment Considerations for Business Owners

3 min read

Wage GarnishmentAccording to the United States Department of Labor’s Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA), wage garnishments are a complex legal process for employers to account for when it comes to employment matters. This article specifically refers to Title III of the Consumer Credit Protection Act. 

Usually authorized through a court order, a wage garnishment directs an employer to withhold or garnish an employee’s wages for a certain amount or percentage to satisfy an outstanding debt. Wage garnishments also can be implemented for delinquent tax obligations and other debts owed to federal agencies of the U.S. federal government, as well as for state-level tax collectors. 

Another consideration for Title III is that for a single debt, employees may not be fired; but if an employee’s earnings are garnished for two or more distinct debts, an employer has the discretion to involuntarily separate an employee from its business. This law also permits varying amounts and percentages of an employee’s “disposable earnings” that may be withheld.

The first step is determining how earnings are defined in the course of deciding the final wage garnishment calculation. Examples include but are not limited to retirement and pension payments to the employee, hourly wages, yearly salaries, commissions, bonuses, along with profit sharing, etc.

When it comes to lump-sum payments, the CCPA requires counting earnings that are for personal services but not including non-personal service-related lump-sum payment compensation as the first step when calculating the final wage garnishment. 

Defining Disposable Earnings

The final amount able to be garnished is determined by the employee’s disposable earnings. This is defined as the earnings remaining once legally mandated deductions are factored into an employee’s earnings. Example deductions include local, federal, and state taxes, along with withholdings for unemployment, Medicare, and Social Security taxes. Voluntary deductions, such as health premiums, voluntary retirement plan contributions, etc., are not factored into the disposable earnings calculation.

When it comes to regular garnishment guidelines, which include non-support, bankruptcy, or tax-based requests, for both state and federal taxes, the maximum weekly amount is the smaller amount of either one-fourth of the worker’s disposable earnings or how much the worker’s disposable earnings exceed 30 times the U.S. minimum wage of $7.25 per hour x 30 hours = $217.50 (as of June 2023).

Looking at a weekly view, if disposable earnings are $217.50 or less, no garnishment can occur. If disposable earnings between $217.50 and up to $290 are considered, only $72.50 may be garnished, depending on how much the outstanding debt is in total. If the worker’s disposable earnings exceed $290 for a weekly pay period, up to one-fourth of the pay period’s disposable earnings can be considered to be garnished. It’s important to note that some bankruptcy court orders, state/federal tax debts, and court orders for child support and/or alimony are not necessarily subject to the garnishment ceilings discussed above.

While this information is not comprehensive for employers, it’s important to understand all the federal, state and local regulations to ensure compliance is achieved to reduce the chances for adherence complications.