When it comes it understanding a net charge-off (NCO), it’s the difference between any recovery of delinquent debt and gross charge-offs a business sees in a defined accounting time frame. NCOs are debts a company projects with a low likelihood of being collected. It can happen when a customer stops paying outstanding invoices or sees a decline in their credit rating.
The first step considers it as a gross charge-off; if any amount is recovered, it’s subtracted to arrive at net charge-offs. If businesses can recover a percentage of what’s been charged off, the recovered monies can be net against the gross charge-offs to realize net charge-offs. A business’ loan loss provision is lowered by the net charge-off amount at the end of the accounting time frame and then refilled for the next accounting time frame based on new estimates for loan losses. This is part of a business’ provision for credit losses (PCL) that projects a certain percentage of accounts unable to be collected.
Accounting in Detail
The following formula calculates net charge-offs (NCO). This assumes a gross charge-off booking of 6 percent of all outstanding loans, with 1 percent ultimately being recovered during a particular accounting time frame.
Net Charge-Offs = Gross Charge-Offs – Amount of Recovered Debt
= 6 percent – 1 percent = 5 percent
Once the figure is calculated, the 1 percent collected adjusts the loan loss provision in the accounting statements.
Banks’ business models and financials demonstrate their ability to pay their depositors competitive interest rates while also being able to make loans. Since banks earn profits via net interest margin, earning a spread between what banks pay depositors on interest rates and what borrowers are charged on loans, the spread is integral to measuring profitability. To generate the total value of a bank’s balance sheet, it’s imperative for banks to estimate and project their charge-offs as accurately as possible.
Financial institutions determine credit loss provisions by analyzing their balance sheets and the level of risk represented by outstanding loans. They look at the ratio of loan losses to overall losses, which is their net charge-off rate. The net charge-off rate is used to evaluate a loan’s book quality against other banks.
How Different Risks Impact Net Charge-Off Levels
Banks that have different loan mixes will see different risk and reward payoffs. If one bank offers primarily secured loans, while it may have lower net interest margins, it will also have lower charge-offs because the collateral backing them is less risky overall. This is compared to other lenders that have a higher level of unsecured loans, such as credit cards and commercial loans. This scenario, in the case of riskier loans, may result in higher net interest margins, but also greater potential for higher losses.
Journal Entry Examples
The following journal entries illustrate how to account for bad debts. Using the direct write-off method, when debt collection efforts have been exhausted, bad debts are recorded as follows:
Expenses for bad debt: Debit $750
Accounts Receivable: Credit $750
If, however, the business recovers anything from the customer’s outstanding invoices, the following journal entries would be added if $200 were received:
Cash: Debit $200
Accounts Receivable: Credit $200
Conclusion
While this is primarily for early-stage companies with a low percentage of credit sales, it illustrates how businesses can update their books when projecting their numbers to account for net charge-offs.
Alan F Burke CPA
Accounting for Net Charge Offs
January 1, 2026 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 3 min read
When it comes it understanding a net charge-off (NCO), it’s the difference between any recovery of delinquent debt and gross charge-offs a business sees in a defined accounting time frame. NCOs are debts a company projects with a low likelihood of being collected. It can happen when a customer stops paying outstanding invoices or sees a decline in their credit rating.
The first step considers it as a gross charge-off; if any amount is recovered, it’s subtracted to arrive at net charge-offs. If businesses can recover a percentage of what’s been charged off, the recovered monies can be net against the gross charge-offs to realize net charge-offs. A business’ loan loss provision is lowered by the net charge-off amount at the end of the accounting time frame and then refilled for the next accounting time frame based on new estimates for loan losses. This is part of a business’ provision for credit losses (PCL) that projects a certain percentage of accounts unable to be collected.
Accounting in Detail
The following formula calculates net charge-offs (NCO). This assumes a gross charge-off booking of 6 percent of all outstanding loans, with 1 percent ultimately being recovered during a particular accounting time frame.
Net Charge-Offs = Gross Charge-Offs – Amount of Recovered Debt
= 6 percent – 1 percent = 5 percent
Once the figure is calculated, the 1 percent collected adjusts the loan loss provision in the accounting statements.
Banks’ business models and financials demonstrate their ability to pay their depositors competitive interest rates while also being able to make loans. Since banks earn profits via net interest margin, earning a spread between what banks pay depositors on interest rates and what borrowers are charged on loans, the spread is integral to measuring profitability. To generate the total value of a bank’s balance sheet, it’s imperative for banks to estimate and project their charge-offs as accurately as possible.
Financial institutions determine credit loss provisions by analyzing their balance sheets and the level of risk represented by outstanding loans. They look at the ratio of loan losses to overall losses, which is their net charge-off rate. The net charge-off rate is used to evaluate a loan’s book quality against other banks.
How Different Risks Impact Net Charge-Off Levels
Banks that have different loan mixes will see different risk and reward payoffs. If one bank offers primarily secured loans, while it may have lower net interest margins, it will also have lower charge-offs because the collateral backing them is less risky overall. This is compared to other lenders that have a higher level of unsecured loans, such as credit cards and commercial loans. This scenario, in the case of riskier loans, may result in higher net interest margins, but also greater potential for higher losses.
Journal Entry Examples
The following journal entries illustrate how to account for bad debts. Using the direct write-off method, when debt collection efforts have been exhausted, bad debts are recorded as follows:
Expenses for bad debt: Debit $750
Accounts Receivable: Credit $750
If, however, the business recovers anything from the customer’s outstanding invoices, the following journal entries would be added if $200 were received:
Cash: Debit $200
Accounts Receivable: Credit $200
Conclusion
While this is primarily for early-stage companies with a low percentage of credit sales, it illustrates how businesses can update their books when projecting their numbers to account for net charge-offs.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Campaign messaging would have you believe retirees just scored a major victory. The talking point is everywhere: Social Security benefits are now tax-free. But anyone who reads the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will discover something different. The legislation contains nothing that removes Social Security from federal taxation. Zero provisions. The tax structure that has applied to benefits for over four decades remains fully intact.
So, what did pass? A new deduction aimed at older Americans. And through some rhetorical gymnastics, that deduction is being sold as something it fundamentally is not.
A Deduction Is Not an Exemption
The OBBBA creates an additional deduction exclusively for seniors. Single filers get $6,000 while married couples receive $12,000. This stacks on top of what they already claim through the standard deduction, lowering their overall taxable income.
For retirees whose financial situation falls in a particular range, this extra write-off might be enough to cancel out whatever portion of their Social Security would normally face taxation. But here’s the catch: the deduction applies to all income equally. It doesn’t single out retirement benefits for protection. If your earnings came entirely from investments or a workplace pension, the math would work identically.
Decades of Unchanged Rules
Federal taxation of Social Security benefits dates back to 1983. President Reagan signed that change with support from both parties, making up to half of benefits taxable for seniors with higher earnings. Then in 1993, Congress and President Clinton pushed the ceiling higher. Under current rules, as much as 85 percent of benefits can count toward taxable income for upper-income retirees.
None of that changed with this bill.
The thresholds determining who pays what have remained frozen since the Clinton era. Single filers earning under $25,000 and couples under $32,000 owe nothing on their benefits. Those in the middle tier face taxes on up to half. And couples bringing in more than $44,000 can see 85 percent of their Social Security added to their taxable total.
Because these cutoffs have never adjusted for inflation, more retirees get pulled into taxable categories every single year. The OBBBA leaves this problem completely unaddressed.
Looking at the Administration’s Own Math
Treasury Department calculations highlighted by the White House reveal how limited the benefit truly is. Picture a single retiree receiving $40,000 annually from Social Security alongside another $40,000 from retirement accounts like an IRA or 401(k). Current law would put their 2026 tax bill at $7,190. Under the new legislation, the amount drops to $5,685, a reduction of roughly $1,500. The senior deduction accounts for approximately $900 of those savings.
Helpful? Sure. But this person still owes thousands in federal taxes. Their Social Security benefits remain part of the calculation. The deduction simply chips away at overall liability without treating retirement benefits any differently than other income sources.
Temporary Relief with Built-In Limits
Unlike corporate tax provisions and cuts benefiting wealthy taxpayers, which received permanent status in the bill, the senior deduction disappears after 2028. It was written with an expiration date from the start.
Income limits further narrow who benefits. Single filers with earnings above $75,000 and married couples exceeding $150,000 see the deduction phase-out entirely. Ironically, these higher-earning retirees facing the steepest Social Security taxation are exactly the ones shut out from this supposed fix.
Conclusion and Why This Framing Succeeds
Announcing a supplemental deduction for older taxpayers generates little excitement. Declaring that Social Security taxation has ended makes waves. Political strategists understand that most people absorb information through headlines rather than legislative analysis. Few voters examine IRS guidance or compare statutory language.
The outcome is clever stagecraft masquerading as meaningful reform. Benefits remain taxable under the same formulas established decades ago. Inflation continues to drag more retirees across taxation thresholds, and this temporary, income-restricted deduction is merely wrapped in revolutionary packaging.
Alan F Burke CPA
What Seniors Actually Got in the Latest Tax Bill
January 1, 2026 · Blog, Financial Planning
⏱ 4 min read
Campaign messaging would have you believe retirees just scored a major victory. The talking point is everywhere: Social Security benefits are now tax-free. But anyone who reads the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will discover something different. The legislation contains nothing that removes Social Security from federal taxation. Zero provisions. The tax structure that has applied to benefits for over four decades remains fully intact.
So, what did pass? A new deduction aimed at older Americans. And through some rhetorical gymnastics, that deduction is being sold as something it fundamentally is not.
A Deduction Is Not an Exemption
The OBBBA creates an additional deduction exclusively for seniors. Single filers get $6,000 while married couples receive $12,000. This stacks on top of what they already claim through the standard deduction, lowering their overall taxable income.
For retirees whose financial situation falls in a particular range, this extra write-off might be enough to cancel out whatever portion of their Social Security would normally face taxation. But here’s the catch: the deduction applies to all income equally. It doesn’t single out retirement benefits for protection. If your earnings came entirely from investments or a workplace pension, the math would work identically.
Decades of Unchanged Rules
Federal taxation of Social Security benefits dates back to 1983. President Reagan signed that change with support from both parties, making up to half of benefits taxable for seniors with higher earnings. Then in 1993, Congress and President Clinton pushed the ceiling higher. Under current rules, as much as 85 percent of benefits can count toward taxable income for upper-income retirees.
None of that changed with this bill.
The thresholds determining who pays what have remained frozen since the Clinton era. Single filers earning under $25,000 and couples under $32,000 owe nothing on their benefits. Those in the middle tier face taxes on up to half. And couples bringing in more than $44,000 can see 85 percent of their Social Security added to their taxable total.
Because these cutoffs have never adjusted for inflation, more retirees get pulled into taxable categories every single year. The OBBBA leaves this problem completely unaddressed.
Looking at the Administration’s Own Math
Treasury Department calculations highlighted by the White House reveal how limited the benefit truly is. Picture a single retiree receiving $40,000 annually from Social Security alongside another $40,000 from retirement accounts like an IRA or 401(k). Current law would put their 2026 tax bill at $7,190. Under the new legislation, the amount drops to $5,685, a reduction of roughly $1,500. The senior deduction accounts for approximately $900 of those savings.
Helpful? Sure. But this person still owes thousands in federal taxes. Their Social Security benefits remain part of the calculation. The deduction simply chips away at overall liability without treating retirement benefits any differently than other income sources.
Temporary Relief with Built-In Limits
Unlike corporate tax provisions and cuts benefiting wealthy taxpayers, which received permanent status in the bill, the senior deduction disappears after 2028. It was written with an expiration date from the start.
Income limits further narrow who benefits. Single filers with earnings above $75,000 and married couples exceeding $150,000 see the deduction phase-out entirely. Ironically, these higher-earning retirees facing the steepest Social Security taxation are exactly the ones shut out from this supposed fix.
Conclusion and Why This Framing Succeeds
Announcing a supplemental deduction for older taxpayers generates little excitement. Declaring that Social Security taxation has ended makes waves. Political strategists understand that most people absorb information through headlines rather than legislative analysis. Few voters examine IRS guidance or compare statutory language.
The outcome is clever stagecraft masquerading as meaningful reform. Benefits remain taxable under the same formulas established decades ago. Inflation continues to drag more retirees across taxation thresholds, and this temporary, income-restricted deduction is merely wrapped in revolutionary packaging.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Tax planning feels like homework nobody wants to do, but here’s the reality: real money is sitting on the table. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act changed the rules this year, and most people are still figuring out what matters for their wallets.
Max Out Everything While You Can
Here’s something many people miss. Every Dec. 31, workplace retirement accounts basically close their books for the year. That’s it, opportunity gone. The limit is $23,500 this year, or $31,000 for those over 50. Also, anyone between 60 and 63 can throw in an extra $11,250 with the new super catch-up provision. That’s serious money that could be working harder instead of going to taxes.
HSAs remain the best-kept secret in tax planning. Most people ignore them until someone explains the magic; it’s literally the only account where taxes never apply. Not when money goes in, not while it grows, and not when it comes out for medical expenses. Singles can contribute $4,300 and families $8,550, with up until the April 2026 tax deadline to make it happen. Starting in 2026, there’s a bonus feature: $150 a month can go toward concierge doctor memberships tax-free.
IRAs deserve attention, too. The contribution limit is $7,000 (or $8,000 for the 50-plus crowd) with that same April deadline. The catch? Income limits and existing workplace plans can complicate things, so checking the rules is important.
Transform Losing Stocks into Tax Wins
Everyone has those regrettable investments. Maybe it was that “sure thing” tech stock or the cryptocurrency experiment that went south. Here’s the good news, selling losers before year-end can offset winners for tax purposes. Even better, losses can erase up to $3,000 of regular income. Whatever doesn’t get used rolls forward indefinitely, like store credit that never expires.
Play the Charity Deduction Game Smart
The standard deduction has increased yet again, standing at $15,000 for singles and $30,000 for married couples. Most people won’t beat that with itemized deductions, but there’s a clever workaround. By bunching several years of charitable giving into 2025, taxpayers can itemize this year and claim the standard deduction in future years. It’s like buying in bulk for tax benefits.
Timing matters because 2026 brings stingier charity rules. Only donations exceeding 0.5 percent of income will count, and high earners face a 35 percent cap. Anyone feeling generous should probably act this year.
Control the Income Timeline
Freelancers and business owners hold the cards on payment timing. That December invoice could easily become January income with a quick conversation. Even employees sometimes have flexibility with bonuses through understanding employers or HR departments. The trick is knowing whether next year’s tax situation will be better or worse.
The Roth Conversion Opportunity
With permanently lower tax rates now locked in, converting traditional retirement funds into Roth accounts makes increasing sense. Yes, taxes are due on the conversion amount today, but then everything grows tax-free forever. Smart planners often execute these moves during lower-income years, like between jobs or early in retirement.
Navigate Required Withdrawals Carefully
Anyone who’s 73 or older must withdraw from retirement accounts by Dec. 31. No exceptions, no excuses. The penalties for forgetting are harsh. First-timers get a choice, either take it now or wait until April. But waiting means two withdrawals hit in 2026, potentially pushing income into higher tax brackets. It’s worth doing the math.
The Charity Strategy Nobody Mentions
After age 70½, a powerful option opens up. You can send up to $108,000 directly from an IRA to charity. This qualified charitable distribution satisfies required withdrawals without adding to taxable income. Married couples can each do this, potentially moving $216,000 to charity while avoiding taxes entirely. For those already charitably inclined, missing this opportunity is literally giving money to the IRS instead of chosen causes.
Take Action Before Time Runs Out
Smart taxpayers are running projections comparing 2025 and 2026 tax scenarios right now. They’re scanning investment accounts for tax-loss harvesting opportunities. They’re accelerating charitable plans into 2025 before the rules tighten. They’re smoothing income across tax years where possible.
Nobody gets excited about tax planning, but a few hours of attention before year-end could save thousands of dollars. Good tax professionals pay for themselves many times over, especially in years with rule changes like this one.
Alan F Burke CPA
Seven Tax Moves to Make Before 2025 Ends – Year-End Tax Planning
December 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
Tax planning feels like homework nobody wants to do, but here’s the reality: real money is sitting on the table. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act changed the rules this year, and most people are still figuring out what matters for their wallets.
Max Out Everything While You Can
Here’s something many people miss. Every Dec. 31, workplace retirement accounts basically close their books for the year. That’s it, opportunity gone. The limit is $23,500 this year, or $31,000 for those over 50. Also, anyone between 60 and 63 can throw in an extra $11,250 with the new super catch-up provision. That’s serious money that could be working harder instead of going to taxes.
HSAs remain the best-kept secret in tax planning. Most people ignore them until someone explains the magic; it’s literally the only account where taxes never apply. Not when money goes in, not while it grows, and not when it comes out for medical expenses. Singles can contribute $4,300 and families $8,550, with up until the April 2026 tax deadline to make it happen. Starting in 2026, there’s a bonus feature: $150 a month can go toward concierge doctor memberships tax-free.
IRAs deserve attention, too. The contribution limit is $7,000 (or $8,000 for the 50-plus crowd) with that same April deadline. The catch? Income limits and existing workplace plans can complicate things, so checking the rules is important.
Transform Losing Stocks into Tax Wins
Everyone has those regrettable investments. Maybe it was that “sure thing” tech stock or the cryptocurrency experiment that went south. Here’s the good news, selling losers before year-end can offset winners for tax purposes. Even better, losses can erase up to $3,000 of regular income. Whatever doesn’t get used rolls forward indefinitely, like store credit that never expires.
Play the Charity Deduction Game Smart
The standard deduction has increased yet again, standing at $15,000 for singles and $30,000 for married couples. Most people won’t beat that with itemized deductions, but there’s a clever workaround. By bunching several years of charitable giving into 2025, taxpayers can itemize this year and claim the standard deduction in future years. It’s like buying in bulk for tax benefits.
Timing matters because 2026 brings stingier charity rules. Only donations exceeding 0.5 percent of income will count, and high earners face a 35 percent cap. Anyone feeling generous should probably act this year.
Control the Income Timeline
Freelancers and business owners hold the cards on payment timing. That December invoice could easily become January income with a quick conversation. Even employees sometimes have flexibility with bonuses through understanding employers or HR departments. The trick is knowing whether next year’s tax situation will be better or worse.
The Roth Conversion Opportunity
With permanently lower tax rates now locked in, converting traditional retirement funds into Roth accounts makes increasing sense. Yes, taxes are due on the conversion amount today, but then everything grows tax-free forever. Smart planners often execute these moves during lower-income years, like between jobs or early in retirement.
Navigate Required Withdrawals Carefully
Anyone who’s 73 or older must withdraw from retirement accounts by Dec. 31. No exceptions, no excuses. The penalties for forgetting are harsh. First-timers get a choice, either take it now or wait until April. But waiting means two withdrawals hit in 2026, potentially pushing income into higher tax brackets. It’s worth doing the math.
The Charity Strategy Nobody Mentions
After age 70½, a powerful option opens up. You can send up to $108,000 directly from an IRA to charity. This qualified charitable distribution satisfies required withdrawals without adding to taxable income. Married couples can each do this, potentially moving $216,000 to charity while avoiding taxes entirely. For those already charitably inclined, missing this opportunity is literally giving money to the IRS instead of chosen causes.
Take Action Before Time Runs Out
Smart taxpayers are running projections comparing 2025 and 2026 tax scenarios right now. They’re scanning investment accounts for tax-loss harvesting opportunities. They’re accelerating charitable plans into 2025 before the rules tighten. They’re smoothing income across tax years where possible.
Nobody gets excited about tax planning, but a few hours of attention before year-end could save thousands of dollars. Good tax professionals pay for themselves many times over, especially in years with rule changes like this one.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
When it comes it understanding a net charge-off (NCO), it’s the difference between any recovery of delinquent debt and gross charge-offs a business sees in a defined accounting time frame. NCOs are debts a company projects with a low likelihood of being collected. It can happen when a customer stops paying outstanding invoices or sees a decline in their credit rating. 
Campaign messaging would have you believe retirees just scored a major victory. The talking point is everywhere: Social Security benefits are now tax-free. But anyone who reads the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will discover something different. The legislation contains nothing that removes Social Security from federal taxation. Zero provisions. The tax structure that has applied to benefits for over four decades remains fully intact.