Canceling Government Funding and Expanding Protections for Veterans

3 min read

hr 4, hr 517, hr1316, s 423, hr1815, s 264, s201Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (HR 517) – On July 24, the president signed into law this bill that allows taxpayers to postpone their filings if their state governor has declared a natural disaster, rather than waiting for the president to declare a federal disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Kustoff on Jan. 16, passed in the House on March 31 and in the Senate on July 10.

Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act (HR 1316) – Introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) on Feb. 13, this legislation is designed to crack down on U.S. adversaries acquiring cutting-edge technology. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce submit an annual report to Congress detailing dual-use export license applications and other requests for authorization for the export, re-export, release and in-country transfer of controlled items to arms-embargoed countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The legislation was passed in the House on May 5, the Senate on May 22 and was signed into law on Aug. 19.

PRO Veterans Act of 2025 (S 423) – The purpose of this act is to prevent fraud and abuse via increased oversight of the Veterans Affairs Department, including critical skill bonuses paid out to senior executives. Moreover, the bill requires quarterly, in-person briefings to congressional veterans’ committees regarding VA departmental budget shortfalls. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Feb. 5, passed in the Senate on April 8 and in the House on July 21. The bill was enacted on Aug. 19.

VA Home Loan Program Reform Act (HR 1815) – This bill was introduced on March 3 by Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), passed in the House on May 19, the Senate on July 15, and signed into law on July 30. The law reauthorizes the VA home loan partial claim and Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) programs. These programs are designed to help distressed veteran homeowners avoid foreclosure by enabling the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness (25 percent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance) of a VA home loan secured by the primary residence of the borrower.

Improving Veterans’ Experience Act of 2025 (S 264) – This bill is meant to improve satisfaction with VA benefits and services by compiling feedback from veterans, families and caregivers. This legislation establishes a Veterans Experience Office (VEO) to manage customer experience initiatives, collect data and coordinate VA departments in order to prevent duplicate efforts and ensure consistent improvements across the board. The bill was introduced on Jan. 28 by Sen. Angus King (I-ME), passed in the Senate on April 8, the House on July 21 and was enacted on Aug. 14.

ACES Act of 2025 (S 201) – This act was introduced by Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) on Jan. 23. It directs the secretary of the VA to study cancer and mortality rates among aviators and aircrews who served in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; and to correlate incidents of cancer among this select group of military personnel. The legislation passed in the Senate on June 3, the House on July 21, and was signed by the president on Aug. 14.

Understanding Depreciation Recapture

3 min read

Understanding Depreciation RecaptureWhen it comes to businesses and asset depreciation, there are many types available, such as straight-line, units of production, double declining balance, and sum of years digits. While these aren’t the only ones, they are available via the IRS code and help businesses reduce their taxable income. However, under certain circumstances, businesses have to be mindful when selling assets for a gain that could cause a tax liability through depreciation recapture.

Understanding Depreciation

Depreciation is defined as the reduction in the value of an asset through wear and tear. It can be a rental property or production equipment. Investors can use depreciation to lower their taxable income. While some companies can depreciate an asset’s value to $0, other companies may determine if an asset has salvage or scrap value when they sell it off to replace it with a more productive asset.

When an asset is sold off and it’s sold for a gain, the Internal Revenue Service considers this depreciation recapture. The IRS makes this determination because it missed the business’ taxable income that was otherwise reduced through depreciation at an earlier point in time.

When a business or investor has had possession of such assets for more than 12 months and it was depreciated to reduce taxable income, taxes may be collected if the asset is sold for a gain. It’s important to note that for assets sold at a loss, depreciation recapture doesn’t apply.

Assets that fall under Section 1250 and Section 1245 of the IRS Code, and what rate the asset is taxed at, depend on how the IRS classifies the asset. Section 1245 taxes filers at ordinary tax rates and applies to personal property such as manufacturing equipment and transportation vehicles. Section 1250 applies to real property such as warehouses, commercial buildings, and rental properties. Taxed at no more than 25 percent, Section 1250 depreciation recapture is indexed according to the filer’s ordinary tax rate.

Calculating Depreciation Recapture

This process looks at the discrepancy between the adjusted cost basis and what the asset sells for. It’s calculated as follows:

  1. Determine the cost paid for the asset, plus additional costs for the asset’s fees
  2. Calculate the asset’s adjusted cost basis. The section looks at both the impact of adding capital improvements to the asset, along with any potential loss accounts.
  3. Is there any loss or gain? Assets sold by a business for a loss, or lower than the adjusted basis, don’t trigger the depreciation recapture. However, if an asset’s sale results in a gain that’s higher than the asset’s adjusted basis, the business incurs a depreciation recapture tax obligation. It’s important to distinguish timelines. For example, if it’s one year or less, it’s short-term. If it’s for more than one year, it’s long-term. 

Illustrating Section 1245 Depreciation Recapture Calculation

As an example, let’s say a company bought a truck for its business needs for $50,000 and owned it for five years. After five years, the company sold it for $30,000.

Accumulated depreciation over the life of the item is $25,000. The adjusted basis is $25,000. The $30,000 sales price, minus the $25,000 adjusted basis, results in a $5,000 gain. With the accumulated depreciation of $25,000 compared to the $5,000 gain, the depreciation recapture is $5,000, which is taxed at ordinary rates.

When it comes to ensuring a business’ tax compliance is adhered to, understanding how depreciation recapture works is one part of the tax code that companies need to understand fully to ensure taxes are filed accurately.

 

Restricted Stock Units: 5 Essential Tax and Financial Planning Strategies

4 min read

Restricted Stock Units, RSUsReceiving restricted stock units (RSUs) may seem straightforward, but the tax and financial planning complexities can catch many employees off guard. Understanding these key strategies might help you avoid costly mistakes and optimize your financial outcomes.

1. Manage Tax Withholding at Vesting

The most common pitfall with RSUs is inadequate tax withholding when shares vest. Companies typically withhold taxes at a flat 22 percent rate for federal taxes (37 percent for amounts over $1 million annually), but this often falls short of your actual tax obligation. Financial planners identify this as the biggest issue they see with RSU clients. Many are surprised by large tax bills because the withholding didn’t cover their full liability.

Managing proper tax withholding is often the primary focus of RSU planning. The challenge becomes even more complex when stock prices are volatile, making it difficult to predict exact tax obligations.

Higher RSU income increases the likelihood of under-withholding. When shares can’t be sold to cover additional taxes, alternative payment methods must be planned. Quarterly estimated taxes are one option, though this becomes complicated when the current year income differs significantly from the prior year.

The most effective approach is to conduct quarterly tax projections or work with a CPA to maintain compliance with safe harbor requirements for federal taxes throughout the year.

2. Comprehensive RSU Planning Questions

While RSUs appear simpler than stock options due to their fixed vesting schedules, this perception can be misleading. Financial advisors warn that numerous organizational details can create problems without proper planning.

Key planning considerations include potential state moves during vesting periods, which trigger mobility tax issues, and coordination with ESPP purchases and stock option exercises to avoid wash sale complications. Essential questions for RSU planning include understanding personal goals, assessing wealth concentration levels, determining how much needs to be diversified, ensuring spouse awareness of concentration risks, analyzing the ratio of vested to unvested shares, tracking upcoming vests and trading windows, and evaluating prior year income impacts.

A critical concern is spousal awareness of company stock concentration. Financial planners frequently encounter situations where busy tech employees accumulate significant wealth while their spouses remain unaware that their entire financial security depends on one company’s stock performance.

3. Reduce Taxable Income During Vesting Years

Beyond harvesting capital losses, several strategies can reduce your overall tax burden in years when RSUs vest. These include maximizing 401(k) deferrals, funding Health Savings Accounts, participating in nonqualified deferred compensation plans if available, and donating appreciated company stock to donor-advised funds to exceed standard deduction thresholds.

4. The Hold Versus Sell Decision

Once RSUs vest and you own the shares, deciding whether to hold or sell becomes crucial. Financial advisors routinely recommend selling RSU shares immediately upon vesting, before significant price fluctuations occur. This recommendation is particularly strong for clients already holding substantial company stock positions, as additional concentration increases unnecessary risk.

Many clients choose to sell immediately and deploy proceeds toward other financial goals. This approach helps diversify their overall portfolio and reduces company-specific risk.

5. Navigate Trading Windows

RSU selling plans must account for company trading windows, which dictate when employees can sell shares. Understanding these restrictions is essential for effective RSU management.

When advisors recommend selling RSUs at vesting, they don’t mean selling on the exact vesting date. Instead, they mean selling when trading windows permit, typically after earnings calls. These windows usually last four to six weeks, and while exact dates can’t be predicted far in advance, historical patterns provide reasonable estimates.

Financial planners coordinate clients’ RSU vesting schedules with anticipated trading windows to develop realistic selling strategies. This coordination ensures clients can execute their plans within company restrictions while maintaining compliance with insider trading rules and any existing 10b5-1 trading plans.

Conclusion

Proper RSU planning requires understanding these interconnected elements and developing strategies that align with your broader financial goals while managing tax implications effectively.