When it comes to the risk of default, Moody’s found that during COVID-19, American businesses had a 7.8 percent chance of defaulting. This is compared to a low of 4 percent in 2021, but lower than the current 9.2 percent risk of default, according to a March 2025 report by the rating agency.
Also known as cash flow available for debt service, CFADS determines how much cash is available to service debt obligations. It looks at different cash inflows/outflows to show both internal (owners and managers) and external audiences (investors) how efficient (or not) a business is in its ability to produce cash flows and manage its debts without defaulting.
While one method businesses use is balancing client sales, it is also common to look at various accounting entries, including Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). The results of CFADS are often used by financial analysts when creating coverage ratios, including the project life coverage ratio (PLCR), the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), and the loan life coverage ratio (LLCR). It can sometimes take the place of EBITDA in certain circumstances. It’s important to note that the three coverage ratios show how well a plan is able to service and not default on debt throughout the entire project’s period.
For example, the DSCR = CFADS / Scheduled Debt Service (Interest + Principal Obligations)
Once this is calculated based on the company’s project specifications, if the result is greater than 1, then it signifies and gives greater confidence to internal and external audiences that the company will be able to meet its milestones and final payments.
The most efficient formula for calculating CFADS is as follows:
EBITDA – Taxes – Positive or Negative Result of Working Capital – Capital Expenditures for Maintenance Only
$200,000 (EBITDA) – $30,000 (Taxes) + $20,000 (assuming there’s a negative $20,000 change in working capital) – $40,000 (assuming the capital expenditure investing in maintenance)
CFADS = $150,000
Sometimes the calculation includes dividends, which need to be factored into the calculation. This example assumes it is not part of the calculation.
Interpreting Results
It’s important to understand that a more detailed analysis helps all audiences determine if the projected cash flow is available for different claimants of the business. While most of the calculations are done via the waterfall model, it’s important to analyze it based upon senior and junior debt, along with equity. If a company declares bankruptcy, senior debt holders are the first priority to be made whole (or as whole as possible, depending on the circumstances). Senior debt is collateralized or secured with company assets that are sold off during bankruptcy. From there, junior debt holders are next in line, followed by convertible note holders, then preferred stockholders, and finally common stockholders.
While this calculation is only one part of the way internal and external stakeholders can measure a company’s financial health, with the chance of more firms defaulting on debt, it’s another tool in a financial analyst’s toolbox.
Alan F Burke CPA
Cash Flow Available for Debt Service (CFADS)
May 1, 2025 · Blog, General Business News
⏱ 3 min read
When it comes to the risk of default, Moody’s found that during COVID-19, American businesses had a 7.8 percent chance of defaulting. This is compared to a low of 4 percent in 2021, but lower than the current 9.2 percent risk of default, according to a March 2025 report by the rating agency.
Also known as cash flow available for debt service, CFADS determines how much cash is available to service debt obligations. It looks at different cash inflows/outflows to show both internal (owners and managers) and external audiences (investors) how efficient (or not) a business is in its ability to produce cash flows and manage its debts without defaulting.
While one method businesses use is balancing client sales, it is also common to look at various accounting entries, including Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). The results of CFADS are often used by financial analysts when creating coverage ratios, including the project life coverage ratio (PLCR), the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), and the loan life coverage ratio (LLCR). It can sometimes take the place of EBITDA in certain circumstances. It’s important to note that the three coverage ratios show how well a plan is able to service and not default on debt throughout the entire project’s period.
For example, the DSCR = CFADS / Scheduled Debt Service (Interest + Principal Obligations)
Once this is calculated based on the company’s project specifications, if the result is greater than 1, then it signifies and gives greater confidence to internal and external audiences that the company will be able to meet its milestones and final payments.
The most efficient formula for calculating CFADS is as follows:
EBITDA – Taxes – Positive or Negative Result of Working Capital – Capital Expenditures for Maintenance Only
$200,000 (EBITDA) – $30,000 (Taxes) + $20,000 (assuming there’s a negative $20,000 change in working capital) – $40,000 (assuming the capital expenditure investing in maintenance)
CFADS = $150,000
Sometimes the calculation includes dividends, which need to be factored into the calculation. This example assumes it is not part of the calculation.
Interpreting Results
It’s important to understand that a more detailed analysis helps all audiences determine if the projected cash flow is available for different claimants of the business. While most of the calculations are done via the waterfall model, it’s important to analyze it based upon senior and junior debt, along with equity. If a company declares bankruptcy, senior debt holders are the first priority to be made whole (or as whole as possible, depending on the circumstances). Senior debt is collateralized or secured with company assets that are sold off during bankruptcy. From there, junior debt holders are next in line, followed by convertible note holders, then preferred stockholders, and finally common stockholders.
While this calculation is only one part of the way internal and external stakeholders can measure a company’s financial health, with the chance of more firms defaulting on debt, it’s another tool in a financial analyst’s toolbox.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to “Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters (HJ Res. 20) – The House and Senate both passed a resolution negating a previous rule mandating that tankless gas-fired water heaters meet certain criteria (less than 2 gallons capacity and greater than 50,000 Btu/hour) for efficiency standards, which would have phased out non-condensing technologies. Introduced by Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) on Jan. 15, the resolution is awaiting signature by the president.
A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions” (SJ Res 18) – This joint resolution, introduced by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) on Feb. 13, reverses a federal regulation governing overdraft fees charged by large banks. The previous rule limited overdraft fees to one of the following options: $5, cap the fee at an amount that covers costs and losses, or disclose the terms of their overdraft loan to give consumers choices for opening a line of overdraft credit, shopping for comparative loans, and determining a payment plan. The resolution passed in the Senate and the House on April 9 and presently awaits signature by the president.
SAVE Act (HR 22) – Introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) on Jan. 3, this legislation passed in the House on April 10 and is currently under consideration in the Senate. This bill would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register to vote in elections for Federal office. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act mandates that U.S. citizens present proof of citizenship in-person to election officials when registering to vote; making changes to their voter status (i.e., address change, party change); or the state election authority requests proof of citizenship when reviewing the integrity of current rolls. Voters must show both a valid ID and documentation that indicates the applicant was born in the United States, such as a passport or birth certificate. However, should the name on the ID and birth certificate not match, the applicant would also have to present legal documentation verifying the reason, such as a marriage certificate or other legal name change certification.
NORRA of 2025 (HR 1526) – Also referred to as the No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025, this legislation would restrict district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctive relief in cases only applicable to the district court. Cases involving two or more states would be referred to a three-judge panel, which would determine whether to issue a nationwide injunction. This bill was introduced by Rep. Daryll Issa (R-CA) on Feb. 24, passed in the House on April 9, and is under consideration in the Senate..
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act (HR 1039) – Introduced on Feb. 6 by Rep. Tom Barrett (R-MI), this bill would direct the Veterans Affairs (VA) to partner with an outside communications agency to make benefits communications more concise and easier for veterans to understand. The bill passed in the House on April 7 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act (HR 586) – The purpose of this bipartisan bill is to authorize the VA to study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma in veterans who served in the areas of conflict during the Vietnam War, including South Vietnam, North Vietnam and surrounding areas like Laos and Cambodia. The study would include identifying the rate of incidence of cholangiocarcinoma from the beginning of the Vietnam era to the date of enactment of this act. The bill was introduced by Rep. Nicolas LaLota (R-NY) on Jan. 21, passed in the House on April 7 and currently lies with the Senate.
Alan F Burke CPA
Rolling Back Regulations, Proving Citizenship Birth for Voting Rights, and Blocking Nationwide Injunctions
May 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 4 min read
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to “Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-Fired Instantaneous Water Heaters (HJ Res. 20) – The House and Senate both passed a resolution negating a previous rule mandating that tankless gas-fired water heaters meet certain criteria (less than 2 gallons capacity and greater than 50,000 Btu/hour) for efficiency standards, which would have phased out non-condensing technologies. Introduced by Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) on Jan. 15, the resolution is awaiting signature by the president.
A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions” (SJ Res 18) – This joint resolution, introduced by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) on Feb. 13, reverses a federal regulation governing overdraft fees charged by large banks. The previous rule limited overdraft fees to one of the following options: $5, cap the fee at an amount that covers costs and losses, or disclose the terms of their overdraft loan to give consumers choices for opening a line of overdraft credit, shopping for comparative loans, and determining a payment plan. The resolution passed in the Senate and the House on April 9 and presently awaits signature by the president.
SAVE Act (HR 22) – Introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) on Jan. 3, this legislation passed in the House on April 10 and is currently under consideration in the Senate. This bill would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register to vote in elections for Federal office. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act mandates that U.S. citizens present proof of citizenship in-person to election officials when registering to vote; making changes to their voter status (i.e., address change, party change); or the state election authority requests proof of citizenship when reviewing the integrity of current rolls. Voters must show both a valid ID and documentation that indicates the applicant was born in the United States, such as a passport or birth certificate. However, should the name on the ID and birth certificate not match, the applicant would also have to present legal documentation verifying the reason, such as a marriage certificate or other legal name change certification.
NORRA of 2025 (HR 1526) – Also referred to as the No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025, this legislation would restrict district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctive relief in cases only applicable to the district court. Cases involving two or more states would be referred to a three-judge panel, which would determine whether to issue a nationwide injunction. This bill was introduced by Rep. Daryll Issa (R-CA) on Feb. 24, passed in the House on April 9, and is under consideration in the Senate..
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act (HR 1039) – Introduced on Feb. 6 by Rep. Tom Barrett (R-MI), this bill would direct the Veterans Affairs (VA) to partner with an outside communications agency to make benefits communications more concise and easier for veterans to understand. The bill passed in the House on April 7 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act (HR 586) – The purpose of this bipartisan bill is to authorize the VA to study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma in veterans who served in the areas of conflict during the Vietnam War, including South Vietnam, North Vietnam and surrounding areas like Laos and Cambodia. The study would include identifying the rate of incidence of cholangiocarcinoma from the beginning of the Vietnam era to the date of enactment of this act. The bill was introduced by Rep. Nicolas LaLota (R-NY) on Jan. 21, passed in the House on April 7 and currently lies with the Senate.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
For many high-income earners and those approaching retirement, a Roth IRA conversion represents a strategic financial move that can significantly impact long-term wealth preservation. This approach allows you to restructure your retirement savings in a way that could potentially reduce your overall tax burden while creating more flexibility in your golden years.
Understanding Roth IRA Conversions
A Roth IRA conversion is when you transfer funds from traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts – such as a 401(k) or Traditional IRA – into a Roth IRA. While this transaction triggers an immediate tax obligation on the converted amount, it eliminates future taxation on both the principal and all investment growth, provided you follow IRS guidelines. The IRS website offers comprehensive information on the specifics of this process.
The primary advantage lies in strategic tax planning: paying taxes now at a potentially lower rate than you might face in the future.
Traditional vs. Roth: Understanding the Tax Timing Difference
When saving for retirement, the choice between traditional and Roth accounts fundamentally comes down to tax timing:
Traditional 401(k): Contributions reduce your current taxable income, increasing your take-home pay today. However, all withdrawals in retirement will be subject to ordinary income taxes, potentially at higher future rates.
Roth 401(k): Contributions are made with after-tax dollars, reducing your current take-home pay. The significant benefit comes later: tax-free withdrawals throughout retirement.
To illustrate, consider a $10,000 contribution while in the 24 percent federal tax bracket:
With a traditional 401(k), your take-home pay only decreases by $7,600 because you save $2,400 in immediate taxes.
With a Roth 401(k), your take-home pay decreases by the full $10,000 as you’re paying taxes upfront.
While traditional accounts offer immediate tax relief, Roth accounts provide tax-free income during retirement and important flexibility that extends beyond just avoiding income taxes.
The IRMAA Factor: A Hidden Retirement Expense
One often overlooked aspect of retirement planning is IRMAA – Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount. This Medicare surcharge applies to higher-income retirees, increasing their Medicare Part B and Part D premiums substantially.
For 2025, married couples filing jointly with income exceeding $206,000 could face premium increases of hundreds of dollars monthly. By strategically converting traditional retirement funds to Roth accounts before retirement, you can potentially keep your future taxable income below IRMAA thresholds, avoiding these additional healthcare costs entirely.
The Long-Term Impact: Required Minimum Distributions
Without implementing Roth conversions, retirement accounts can accumulate substantially larger taxable balances. By age 75, Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from traditional accounts can be three times higher than for those who gradually converted assets to Roth accounts.
These larger RMDs can create cascading financial challenges:
Pushing income above Medicare IRMAA thresholds
Significantly increasing Medicare premiums by thousands annually
Creating higher tax burdens for surviving spouses who must file as single taxpayers
Early Roth conversions – performed strategically during years with stable tax rates – can dramatically reduce future taxable income while creating greater financial flexibility throughout retirement.
Legacy Planning Benefits
Roth IRAs offer substantial advantages for estate planning. The accounts pass tax-free to heirs (provided the five-year holding requirement is met). For surviving spouses, Roth IRAs provide financial security without RMD concerns. When both spouses have passed, beneficiaries inherit completely tax-free income.
Is a Roth Conversion Right for You?
While powerful, Roth conversions aren’t universally beneficial. Consider this strategy if:
You anticipate higher tax rates in your future
You have several years before RMDs begin (typically at age 73)
You have sufficient savings to cover the conversion taxes without depleting the retirement accounts themselves.
You want to minimize potential IRMAA surcharges or tax implications for a surviving spouse.
Conversions tend to be most advantageous when you can maintain a reasonable tax bracket (24 percent or lower) during the conversion process.
Conclusion
When approaching Roth conversions thoughtfully and as part of a comprehensive retirement strategy, you can potentially create more tax-efficient income streams, avoid Medicare premium surcharges, and leave a more valuable legacy for your loved ones.
Alan F Burke CPA
Strategic Roth IRA Conversions: Maximizing Retirement Income While Minimizing Taxes
May 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
For many high-income earners and those approaching retirement, a Roth IRA conversion represents a strategic financial move that can significantly impact long-term wealth preservation. This approach allows you to restructure your retirement savings in a way that could potentially reduce your overall tax burden while creating more flexibility in your golden years.
Understanding Roth IRA Conversions
A Roth IRA conversion is when you transfer funds from traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts – such as a 401(k) or Traditional IRA – into a Roth IRA. While this transaction triggers an immediate tax obligation on the converted amount, it eliminates future taxation on both the principal and all investment growth, provided you follow IRS guidelines. The IRS website offers comprehensive information on the specifics of this process.
The primary advantage lies in strategic tax planning: paying taxes now at a potentially lower rate than you might face in the future.
Traditional vs. Roth: Understanding the Tax Timing Difference
When saving for retirement, the choice between traditional and Roth accounts fundamentally comes down to tax timing:
Traditional 401(k): Contributions reduce your current taxable income, increasing your take-home pay today. However, all withdrawals in retirement will be subject to ordinary income taxes, potentially at higher future rates.
Roth 401(k): Contributions are made with after-tax dollars, reducing your current take-home pay. The significant benefit comes later: tax-free withdrawals throughout retirement.
To illustrate, consider a $10,000 contribution while in the 24 percent federal tax bracket:
With a traditional 401(k), your take-home pay only decreases by $7,600 because you save $2,400 in immediate taxes.
With a Roth 401(k), your take-home pay decreases by the full $10,000 as you’re paying taxes upfront.
While traditional accounts offer immediate tax relief, Roth accounts provide tax-free income during retirement and important flexibility that extends beyond just avoiding income taxes.
The IRMAA Factor: A Hidden Retirement Expense
One often overlooked aspect of retirement planning is IRMAA – Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount. This Medicare surcharge applies to higher-income retirees, increasing their Medicare Part B and Part D premiums substantially.
For 2025, married couples filing jointly with income exceeding $206,000 could face premium increases of hundreds of dollars monthly. By strategically converting traditional retirement funds to Roth accounts before retirement, you can potentially keep your future taxable income below IRMAA thresholds, avoiding these additional healthcare costs entirely.
The Long-Term Impact: Required Minimum Distributions
Without implementing Roth conversions, retirement accounts can accumulate substantially larger taxable balances. By age 75, Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from traditional accounts can be three times higher than for those who gradually converted assets to Roth accounts.
These larger RMDs can create cascading financial challenges:
Pushing income above Medicare IRMAA thresholds
Significantly increasing Medicare premiums by thousands annually
Creating higher tax burdens for surviving spouses who must file as single taxpayers
Early Roth conversions – performed strategically during years with stable tax rates – can dramatically reduce future taxable income while creating greater financial flexibility throughout retirement.
Legacy Planning Benefits
Roth IRAs offer substantial advantages for estate planning. The accounts pass tax-free to heirs (provided the five-year holding requirement is met). For surviving spouses, Roth IRAs provide financial security without RMD concerns. When both spouses have passed, beneficiaries inherit completely tax-free income.
Is a Roth Conversion Right for You?
While powerful, Roth conversions aren’t universally beneficial. Consider this strategy if:
You anticipate higher tax rates in your future
You have several years before RMDs begin (typically at age 73)
You have sufficient savings to cover the conversion taxes without depleting the retirement accounts themselves.
You want to minimize potential IRMAA surcharges or tax implications for a surviving spouse.
Conversions tend to be most advantageous when you can maintain a reasonable tax bracket (24 percent or lower) during the conversion process.
Conclusion
When approaching Roth conversions thoughtfully and as part of a comprehensive retirement strategy, you can potentially create more tax-efficient income streams, avoid Medicare premium surcharges, and leave a more valuable legacy for your loved ones.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.