Rules of the Roth

4 min read

Rules of Roth IRAWith a Roth IRA, the owner can make limited contributions each year. In 2025, the limit is $7,000; $8,000 if age 50 or older. Only people who earn less than $150,000 (single filers) or under $236,000 (married filing jointly) can make a full Roth IRA contribution. While contributions do not qualify for a tax deduction, earnings are not taxable once the account has been open for five years. Contributions, which were previously taxed as income, can be withdrawn at any time.

Once you open and contribute to a Roth IRA, the five-year countdown begins before you can take any earnings out tax-free. However, the holding period is actually measured from Jan. 1 of the year you made the first contribution.

For example, if you opened your Roth IRA on Dec. 31, 2024, the holding period backs up to Jan. 1, 2024. Therefore, your holding period is technically only four years instead of five to avoid paying taxes on earnings.

However, it gets even better because you are allowed to make a Roth contribution for the prior tax year up until tax day in April. That means if you open a Roth in April 2025 and designate your contribution for 2024, your holding period is shortened by another four months.

This is why it’s important to open a Roth as soon as possible, even if you cannot contribute a lot of money in the near future. It makes a great strategy for a high school or college student with job earnings to at least open a Roth for future use. While there is no upfront tax deduction, you may withdraw contributions penalty and tax-free at any time – which makes it ideal as both a liquid emergency account as well as long-term savings.

As for withdrawing earnings, the rules are trickier. As far as the IRS is concerned, contributions are withdrawn first and then earnings. Note that when earnings are withdrawn before age 59½, the amount is subject to both taxes and a 10 percent penalty, but there are exceptions that waive the penalty. For example, if your account is less than five years old, you can still withdraw earnings (penalty-free but still subject to taxes) for the following purposes:

  • To help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000)
  • To pay for college
  • To pay certain emergency expenses
  • To pay for expenses in connection with a federally qualified disaster
  • To pay expenses related to a birth or adoption
  • To pay for unreimbursed medical expenses or health insurance if unemployed
  • If you become disabled or are a survivor of domestic abuse

If your account is older than five years, you can avoid both taxes and the penalty if the funds are used to help pay for a first-time home purchase (up to $10,000) or if you become disabled.

After age 59½, there are no taxes and no penalties for any money withdrawn from a Roth IRA for any reason.

Multiple Roths

The same five-year holding period applies to all the Roths you own, with the clock starting at the first contribution to your first Roth. This means that if five years after the date you open your first Roth, you open a new Roth and contribute a bunch of income, you won’t have to wait another five years to tap those earnings tax-free. This perk does not apply to a Roth 401(k) account, which maintains a separate five-year holding period.

Conversion Benefits

When you convert a traditional IRA or 401(k) to a Roth (assuming your plan allows in-service withdrawals or in-plan conversions), you must pay income taxes in the year the money is converted. However, there are some very good reasons to convert:

  • Tax-Free Income – By converting assets when you’re still working, you can pay the taxes owed with current income, but from that point on, the Roth IRA will grow tax-free. This is particularly helpful in diversifying your tax liability during retirement if you have other income sources (e.g., pension, brokerage account, Social Security).
  • Eliminate RMDs – If you continue working into your 70s, you may continue contributing to your Roth IRA, and assets converted from a 401(k) or traditional IRA are no longer subject to required minimum distributions. This way, your full account balance has the opportunity to continue growing for later retirement and/or for your heirs.

Be aware that converting a taxable retirement account to a Roth IRA begins its own five-year timetable, so convert long before you need to begin withdrawals.

2025 U.S. Tax Legislation Forecast: What to Expect

4 min read

2025 U.S. Tax Legislation ForecastAs 2025 unfolds, U.S. tax policy is poised for significant shifts, particularly with a new Republican administration under President Donald Trump. The year ahead will likely see a range of tax reforms, largely driven by the GOP’s objectives and campaign promises. In this article, we’ll explore the major tax policy trends, legislative developments, and administration changes that may shape U.S. tax law in 2025.

The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions

2024 also saw two major Supreme Court decisions with significant tax implications. In the Moore case, the Court ruled narrowly on the issue of wealth taxation, leaving open the possibility of revisiting the question in the future. While wealth tax proposals had gained some traction among Democrats, the Court’s decision, combined with the political climate, suggests that such proposals are unlikely to gain much momentum under the new administration.

The Loper Bright decision, which questioned the deference given to government regulations, could have far-reaching effects on tax policy. The ruling makes it more difficult for agencies like the IRS to issue regulations without clear legislative guidance, potentially leading to more legal challenges to IRS regulations and shifting the balance of power between lawmakers and regulatory agencies.

2025: A New Republican Agenda

With a Republican administration taking office in 2025, tax policy is expected to shift dramatically. President Trump, along with a Republican-controlled Senate and House, will likely push for several key changes to tax law.

One of the primary objectives will be to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that are set to expire. This includes individual tax cuts, corporate rate reductions and changes to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap. The extension of other expiring provisions involving lifetime gift and estate tax exemptions, AMT, child tax credits, and the mortgage interest deduction may also be on the table. Additionally, the GOP is expected to explore new tax cuts, with some lawmakers proposing measures like eliminating taxes on tips, which was promoted during Trump’s election campaign.

On the corporate side, there may be discussions about lowering the effective tax rate through credits and incentives rather than direct reductions to the statutory corporate tax rate. There also could be movement on tax expensing for research and development, as well as other measures to incentivize business investment.

Potential Revenue-Raising Measures

Despite the tax cuts expected to dominate the agenda, there may be some revenue-raising measures included in the GOP’s tax proposals. The focus on reducing deficits could lead to efforts to cut some of the green credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, although these cuts are unlikely to raise significant revenue. There also may be attempts to tighten international tax rules from the TCJA to generate more revenue.

President Trump has also proposed replacing individual income taxes with increases in tariffs, implementing a universal 20 percent tariff across the board, and implementing an additional 50 percent tariff on imports from China.

IRS Funding and Administration Changes

Under the new administration, the IRS is expected to face significant cuts, particularly in its enforcement budget. The $80 billion allocated to the agency in recent years, which was intended to improve taxpayer services and combat tax evasion, is likely to be rolled back. Republicans have expressed strong opposition to the IRS’ expanded powers and are expected to push for a reallocation of those funds toward customer service rather than enforcement.

Additionally, the new administration may replace current IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, who was appointed during the Biden administration. Trump could nominate a new commissioner, and if this happens, it could spark further debates over the direction of the IRS in the coming years.

Conclusion

2025 promises to be a dynamic year for U.S. tax policy, with significant changes expected under the new administration. Key issues to watch include the fate of the TCJA’s expiring provisions, potential new tax cuts, and ongoing debates over IRS funding and regulations. As the administration works to implement its agenda, there will likely be contentious discussions and compromises on Capitol Hill, setting the stage for a new era of tax policy for the United States.

Beefing Up Laws for Illegal Immigrants and Preparing for Future Disasters

3 min read

S 5,HR 152,HR 153,HR 164,HR 471, HR 187, HCon Res. 1Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.

Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.

Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.

POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.

MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.