Blog Archives | Page 23 of 74

August 1, 2025

How Businesses Can Build Disinformation Resilience

The digital landscape has rapidly advanced, fueled by generative AI and other transformative technologies. Although this has come with great opportunities, it has also introduced new strategic threats. Among these is disinformation. The World Economic Forum classifies misinformation and disinformation as a top global threat alongside conflict and environment in its 2025 global risks report. With generative AI becoming more sophisticated, threat actors (like deepfakes, voice cloning, viral hoaxes and AI-driven scams) are increasing in frequency and precision. Therefore, business leaders need to act fast to build disinformation resilience.

Why Disinformation Matters for Business

Disinformation is the intentional spread of false or misleading information with malicious intent. This is unlike misinformation, which is unintentional and often shared by individuals who believe it’s true. However, both can have serious consequences for a business.

Historically, disinformation mainly targeted political processes or public institutions. Today, this threat has expanded to the corporate world to become a strategic business risk.

For example, a deepfake video of a CEO announcing mass layoffs will likely affect a company’s stock price. While fake reviews – positive or negative – can also sway consumer decisions. A viral tweet might spark public backlash and disrupt operations. In the United States, billions of dollars have already been lost from disinformation created by deepfakes, with the figures expected to rise in the coming years.

Impact of Disinformation on Business Operations

Disinformation impacts a business in various ways, such as:

Financial risk – false narratives can manipulate market behavior or stock prices.
Reputation and trust – fabricated information can erode customer trust and brand credibility.
Internal noise – false information can lead to confusion or the unintentional spread of incorrect content.
Operational disruption – false reports may trigger emergency protocols, overreactions or divert resources from core objectives.
Regulatory and legal exposure – new laws hold platforms and even companies accountable for hosting or spreading harmful fake content.

Building a Proactive Disinformation Resilience Strategy

To effectively counter disinformation, businesses need a comprehensive strategy that integrates technological solutions, human intelligence, and proactive communication.

Awareness and Training
Employees are a great asset and at the same time can be a potential vulnerability. Therefore, all employees from frontline staff to C-suite should be aware of how disinformation works, know red flags, and be empowered to verify suspicious content. They should frequently undergo comprehensive training programs that focus on digital literacy, critical thinking, and fact-checking techniques.
Monitoring and Detection Tools
Early detection is crucial. It requires advanced monitoring tools that deploy AI-powered social listening, threat intelligence platforms, and real-time deepfake detection systems that analyze image, video, and audio content. Combining these tools with automated alerts enables a swift response before a false narrative spreads.
Robust Internal Protocols
Develop and enforce clear escalation protocols for suspected disinformation. These should detail a chain of command, verification steps, and PR responses. Employees must know whom to alert and how to safeguard systems quickly.
Platform and Partnership Engagement
Collaborate with social platforms, fact checkers, and cybersecurity firms to detect and report false content. This will also help build relationships with journalists and analysis firms to enable faster content removal and more credible public debunking.
Trust-First Content Strategies
Deploy blue-check verified accounts, metadata authentication, digital signature,s and watermarking. A business also may consistently share authentic updates, reinforce company values, and build a track record of transparency to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Policy and Regulatory Landscape

Governments worldwide are recognizing the gravity of this threat. New laws are emerging globally to hold platforms accountable and to protect individuals and businesses.

One example is the Take It Down Act, signed into law on May 19, 2025, which mandates the removal of non-consensual deepfakes. This sets a legal precedent for holding platforms responsible for hosting synthetic media that harms individuals or businesses.

Other legal frameworks are evolving globally with a focus on developing fact-checking and AI-usage policies. Businesses must stay informed of the latest regulations and ensure their internal policies are compliant.

Future Proofing with AI and Collaboration

While generative AI can be used wrongly, it is also a powerful tool in real-time detection and content verification. Since the fight against disinformation is a continuous journey of adaptation and vigilance, businesses must:

Integrate advanced detection systems into their security stack
Standardize watermarking across distributed content
Engage in multi-stakeholder alliances across industries and governments to share insights and define best practices

Conclusion

In an era where false information spreads faster than the truth, disinformation is no longer just a public concern but also a serious business risk. The threat landscape is evolving fast with deepfake scams and coordinated smear campaigns; hence, corporate strategy must evolve, too. Businesses have to build disinformation resilience through proactive systems, employee awareness, trusted communication channels, and ongoing vigilance.

August 1, 2025

The Big Beautiful Bill, Rolling Back Public Television and Radio, and Regulating the Cryptocurrency Industry

One Big Beautiful Bill Act (HR 1) – Introduced by Rep. Jody Arrington (R-TX) on May 20, this bill passed in the House on May 22, the Senate with changes on July 1, and once again in the House on July 3. Signed into law on July 4, this bill includes the following provisions:

Makes permanent the income and estate tax provisions passed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Increases the annual limit to $7,500 for Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), starting in 2026.
Makes permanent the ability for employers to offer tax-free student loan repayment assistance up to $5,250 a year, with the cap indexed for inflation.
Starting in 2026, new tax-advantaged “Trump Account” savings plans may be opened for eligible children under age 18. The account will receive a one-time $1,000 deposit by the government (for children born in 2025 through 2028) and allow for non-deductible/after-tax contributions of up to $5,000 a year (indexed for inflation). However, note that funds cannot be withdrawn before the beneficiary turns 18, and money withdrawn before age 59½ is subject to both income taxes and a 10 percent penalty (with exceptions for college tuition and a first-time home purchase).
While the bill calls for untaxed tips and overtime pay, this tax break will be delivered in the form of a deduction claimed on individual tax returns. For cash or charged tips, up to $25,000; for overtime pay, the deduction is up to $12,500/$25,000 for joint filers. Phase-out deductions will apply to both based on income.
Allows up to a $10,000 tax deduction for interest paid on an auto loan used to purchase a qualified vehicle.
New tax deduction for seniors age 65+: $6,000 for single filers; $12,000 for joint filers.
The bill does not include an extension of the enhanced credits for the Affordable Care Act, scheduled to expire at the end of the year. This is expected to increase average exchange health insurance premiums by 75 percent starting next year.

Relating to consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4) to rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the president on June 3, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (HRes 590) – On July 17, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) introduced this rescissions bill, which essentially cuts $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CBP). The CBP is a private, nonprofit corporation that was authorized by Congress in 1967 to be the steward of the federal government’s investment in public broadcasting. The elimination of this federal funding will force many local public radio and television stations to shut down. The legislation, which also rescinds $8 billion from a variety of foreign aid programs, was passed as a House rule that enabled full passage of the rescissions bill due to a provision that avoids a direct vote on the bill. The bill passed in the House on July 18 and does not require approval by the Senate or to be signed into law by the president.

GENIUS Act (S 1582) – Introduced by Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) on May 1, this legislation is designed to regulate the currently unregulated cryptocurrency industry. The Act requires issuers to back stablecoins on at least a $1-to-$1 basis. The bill is intended to set guardrails for the industry via full reserve backing, monthly audits, and anti-money laundering compliance regulations. This bill also enables a wider range of issuers to enter the market, including banks, fintechs, and major retailers. The legislation was passed in the Senate on June 17, the House on July 1,7, and was signed into law on July 18.

Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (HR 1919) – Introduced by Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) on March 6, this is a companion bill to the Genius Act. It would prohibit Federal Reserve Banks from offering certain products or services directly to individuals and disallow the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, among other provisions (CBDC stands for Central Bank Digital Currency). The bill passed in the House on July 17 and currently awaits its fate in the Senate.

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (HR 3633) – Another Genius Act companion bill, the goal of this legislation is to provide a regulatory system by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for the sale of digital commodities. The bill was introduced on May 29 by Rep. French Hill (R-AR), passed in the House on July 17, and currently lies with the Senate.

August 1, 2025

How to Account for Debit Notes

With the global digital payments market expected to see north of $20 trillion in transaction value in 2025, according to Statista, business-to-business transactions are undoubtedly going to see some action. Debit notes are one tool that businesses have to record their transactions and corresponding payments. Understanding what debit notes are and how they work is essential for a smooth transaction.

Defining Debit Notes

A debit note is a form that advises a vendor’s customer of any outstanding balances owed. It can either let the customer know of an upcoming invoice or advise them of an outstanding payment. Similarly, customers can use debit notes to document the return of goods that are damaged or otherwise unsatisfactory, including the projected credit for a future order.

Understanding Debit Note Uses

Debit notes are used between commercial entities through transactions that involve the supplier sending the customer goods before payment is made. Although the goods have physically moved and payment hasn’t been remitted until an invoice is sent and ultimately satisfied by the customer, a debit note communicates that the merchant has debited the customer’s ledger.

While it’s primarily used by companies that either produce goods or act as warehouse operators, if a business sublets some of its warehouse space, debit notes can communicate upcoming bills to its commercial tenants, even though it’s not its primary business. They can also be used by businesses to fix invoice mistakes. If overbilling has occurred, a debit note can be used to correct the imbalance.

These documents can provide a window for the customer to send back the goods before payment is submitted. It can be as simple as using a postcard to document the outstanding debt to the buyer. While it’s completely optional and only used by certain businesses, buyers can request one for their own record-keeping purposes. Usually used by commercial or business-to-business entities, a debit note (or credit note) is entered into the business’ accounting records to track amounts due.

It’s important to distinguish the differences between a debit note and a credit note. Debit notes add to the purchaser’s liability and inform the purchaser of their new debt to the vendor. In contrast, credit notes lower the buyer’s liability, permitting the buyer to know the scope and amount of the credit for damaged or unsatisfactory goods.

Another reason a debit note is issued is when an order is modified. Other circumstances might include if goods are damaged during production or in transit before inspection (conducted by the vendor); a buyer declines an order; there is a need to correct an order; or a credit note pays for the bill’s value.

Differences with an Invoice

While a debit note communicates the status of a future payment or adjustment to an order, invoices are more detailed. Invoices include the sales details, goods/services provided, individual unit prices, the complete cost, and the contact information for the seller and buyer.

Illustrating How It Works

Let’s say a business uses its credit line to buy 100,000 widgets from another company at an agreed-upon purchase price of $2 each. The supplier drops off the 100,000 widgets and remits the invoice for $200,000 to the business. However, the business received 20,000 widgets in unsatisfactory condition (damaged, etc.).

When this happens, the purchasing company creates a debit note and sends it to the supplier upon receipt of the damaged 20,000 widgets. This action will lead to an adjustment, debiting the amount owed of $40,000.

In this case, the transactions will be accounted for as follows:

n Seller debits its accounts receivable by $40,000

n Buyer will credit its accounts payable for $40,000

While this demonstrates how it works, it also shows that debit notes can be powerful tools for both buyers and sellers.

Conclusion

When it comes to debit notes, businesses and commercial customers of other businesses can leverage this tool to ensure they’re adjusting current and future orders.