According to the May 2019 Financial Stability Report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, there was more than $15 billion in outstanding commercial credit. While there are many ways companies can obtain funding, additional paid-in-capital (APIC) is one way to accomplish this goal.
Defining APIC
This term refers to the gap between a share’s par value and the distribution price. If an investor pays more than what the company sets for its IPO price offer, that is what determines APIC.
Defining Par Value
Par value is the initial offer price a publicly traded company decides to offer shares to investors during its initial public offering (IPO) on exchanges. Depending on the actual initial price for an IPO, it can be done for publicity reasons, to reduce litigation risks and to aid in improving shareholder return on investment.
Market Value
Based on how well a publicly traded company performs, this is the prevailing price that investors assign to the share price, which varies dynamically.
Determining APIC
Calculating APIC is done as follows:
APIC = (Issue Price – Par Value) x Number of Shares Acquired by Investors
If a company establishes a stock price of $2 per share, investors can decide to bid up each share price to $3 or $7 or $20 via their purchases. If there are 2 million shares outstanding selling for a total of $44 million, the excess of $40 million (beyond the $4 million in par value) is the APIC.
Based on these circumstances, a company’s balance sheet should have the following entries:
– $4 million (paid-in-capital)
– $40 million (additional paid-in-capital)
When accounting for these stock purchases in this scenario, APIC is recorded on the balance sheet under the shareholder equity (SE) section. This can be seen as increasing a company’s bottom line because it results in them receiving additional cash from stockholders.
When it comes to recording the journal entry, the total cash generated by the IPO is recorded as an asset (debit) on the balance sheet, while the common stock and APIC are recorded as equity (credits).
Utility
The utility metric can yield a considerable amount of a business’ share capital, prior to retained earnings starting to accumulate. It helps provide a financial cushion for the company if retained earnings demonstrate a shortfall.
Companies that issue shares permit the business to not increase its fixed costs. Since this method is chosen instead of issuing bonds, there are no interest payments due to buyers of the bonds. Investors are not due any payments, including no dividend obligations. Business assets are also not subject to investor claims. Once shares are issued to investors, the generated funds are non-restricted, so the company can direct the funds as necessary.
APIC lets businesses produce money without any required assets backing the transaction. Depending on the company’s future performance, buying stock at the IPO can generate massive returns.
Further considerations
When there are additional share offerings post IPO, either common or preferred shares, the APIC levels may grow, necessitating them to be documented on the business’s financial statements. If share repurchases are made, levels can be decreased.
While each business has many options to raise money, if a company uses this method, it’s important to ensure that they are accounted for properly. As always, contact a professional to ensure the best personalized advice.
Alan F Burke CPA
How to Account for Additional Paid-in-Capital (APIC)
December 1, 2025 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 3 min read
According to the May 2019 Financial Stability Report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, there was more than $15 billion in outstanding commercial credit. While there are many ways companies can obtain funding, additional paid-in-capital (APIC) is one way to accomplish this goal.
Defining APIC
This term refers to the gap between a share’s par value and the distribution price. If an investor pays more than what the company sets for its IPO price offer, that is what determines APIC.
Defining Par Value
Par value is the initial offer price a publicly traded company decides to offer shares to investors during its initial public offering (IPO) on exchanges. Depending on the actual initial price for an IPO, it can be done for publicity reasons, to reduce litigation risks and to aid in improving shareholder return on investment.
Market Value
Based on how well a publicly traded company performs, this is the prevailing price that investors assign to the share price, which varies dynamically.
Determining APIC
Calculating APIC is done as follows:
APIC = (Issue Price – Par Value) x Number of Shares Acquired by Investors
If a company establishes a stock price of $2 per share, investors can decide to bid up each share price to $3 or $7 or $20 via their purchases. If there are 2 million shares outstanding selling for a total of $44 million, the excess of $40 million (beyond the $4 million in par value) is the APIC.
Based on these circumstances, a company’s balance sheet should have the following entries:
– $4 million (paid-in-capital)
– $40 million (additional paid-in-capital)
When accounting for these stock purchases in this scenario, APIC is recorded on the balance sheet under the shareholder equity (SE) section. This can be seen as increasing a company’s bottom line because it results in them receiving additional cash from stockholders.
When it comes to recording the journal entry, the total cash generated by the IPO is recorded as an asset (debit) on the balance sheet, while the common stock and APIC are recorded as equity (credits).
Utility
The utility metric can yield a considerable amount of a business’ share capital, prior to retained earnings starting to accumulate. It helps provide a financial cushion for the company if retained earnings demonstrate a shortfall.
Companies that issue shares permit the business to not increase its fixed costs. Since this method is chosen instead of issuing bonds, there are no interest payments due to buyers of the bonds. Investors are not due any payments, including no dividend obligations. Business assets are also not subject to investor claims. Once shares are issued to investors, the generated funds are non-restricted, so the company can direct the funds as necessary.
APIC lets businesses produce money without any required assets backing the transaction. Depending on the company’s future performance, buying stock at the IPO can generate massive returns.
Further considerations
When there are additional share offerings post IPO, either common or preferred shares, the APIC levels may grow, necessitating them to be documented on the business’s financial statements. If share repurchases are made, levels can be decreased.
While each business has many options to raise money, if a company uses this method, it’s important to ensure that they are accounted for properly. As always, contact a professional to ensure the best personalized advice.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
In 2024, the median household income in the United States was $83,730. However, the national average annual cost of 24-hour paid long-term care (LTC) for a retiree age 65 and older was more than $125,000, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Moreover, one in five seniors will require care for more than five years.
Obviously, the math varies by household, but the reality is that the majority of older Americans who rely on paid caregiving will use much of their retirement savings and investments to pay for it. When considering insurance, there are presently two options: Long Term Care Insurance (LTCi) and Hybrid Life Insurance with an LTC component. Be aware that each policy offers a throng of variations and exclusions, so it is important to dig into the details of individual policies before making a decision.
Long Term Care Insurance
Purchasing a long-term care insurance policy can help offset the cost of caregiving for either in-home care (in some cases, even payouts for family caregivers) or care outside the home (e.g., adult daycare services, assisted living, memory care, nursing home). However, it’s important to understand the following about LTCi.
It can be quite expensive.
Premiums can range from $2,000 a year for a man in his 50s to more than $12,000 a year for a woman in her 70s. Furthermore, premiums increase annually until benefits begin (premiums cease while benefits are paid).
It may not cover the full cost of care.
Unless care is needed for only a few hours a day, long-term care policies generally do not cover the full cost of paid caregiving. For example, let’s say a policy pays $150 a day, but the owner needs care for eight hours a day. His in-home caregiver charges $30 an hour. That means his cost is $240 a day, so he’ll have to pay the additional $90 a day out of his own pocket. That’s
up to $2,790 a month or $32,850 a year. So, while LTCi can help defray the cost, someone who needs extensive care must have other assets to cover the rest of the cost. For an elderly person who needs 24-hour home care, the cost can be exponential.
Many new policies cover only a handful of years.
When you purchase an LTCi policy, you choose from various options that increase or decrease your premium. For example, coverage periods may range from two years to five years to life. You may also select a waiting period before coverage begins after purchase, which could range from 30 days to 365 days. The longer the wait period, the lower the premium. If you have an immediate need for coverage, you might be denied coverage altogether. That is why it’s best to purchase coverage when you are younger (50s) and presumably healthy.
You don’t get to choose when to start benefits.
LTCi coverage doesn’t kick in until you qualify, which generally means you are no longer able to independently conduct some or all of the prescribed daily living activities. The five primary qualifiers are bathing, going to the toilet, dressing yourself, feeding yourself, and the ability to move from bed to chair/wheelchair. Qualification to begin taking LTCi benefits usually requires physician verification.
The downside of a standalone LTCi policy is that it is a “use-it-or-lose-it” type of contract, much like auto or homeowner’s insurance. In other words, you may pay for it for decades but never actually use it, so all the premiums paid are lost.
Hybrid Life/Long Term Care Insurance
On the other hand, a hybrid insurance policy will pay out some portion of unused proceeds to beneficiaries upon the death of the policyowner. A hybrid policy is basically a life insurance policy with an LTCi rider or an accelerated benefit clause, which, either way, means it will cost more.
First and foremost, it works just like life insurance – once the owner passes away, the beneficiary receives a payout. However, if the owner needs money to pay for long-term care while he is still alive, he can tap the rider or life insurance payout to pay for the care. Then, when he passes away, his heirs receive any amount of the unused proceeds. With this type of policy, the owner doesn’t pay for LTCi coverage he does not need, but it’s available if he does need it.
Premiums for a hybrid policy, like any life insurance, depend on the age, gender, health, and amount of insurance proceeds desired, as well as any additional charge for the LTCi rider. Some policies include LTC benefits as a standard feature.
Employer-Sponsored Benefit
If your employer offers long-term care insurance as a voluntary benefit, it’s worth considering because group rates are generally cheaper than on the individual market. However, while employer-sponsored LTCi policies are usually portable – meaning you can keep paying for it after you leave your employer – your premiums may increase when no longer part of the group policy.
As always, reach out to a professional when it comes to planning for you and your family’s future care.
Alan F Burke CPA
Long Term Care Insurance Options
December 1, 2025 · Blog, Financial Planning
⏱ 5 min read
In 2024, the median household income in the United States was $83,730. However, the national average annual cost of 24-hour paid long-term care (LTC) for a retiree age 65 and older was more than $125,000, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Moreover, one in five seniors will require care for more than five years.
Obviously, the math varies by household, but the reality is that the majority of older Americans who rely on paid caregiving will use much of their retirement savings and investments to pay for it. When considering insurance, there are presently two options: Long Term Care Insurance (LTCi) and Hybrid Life Insurance with an LTC component. Be aware that each policy offers a throng of variations and exclusions, so it is important to dig into the details of individual policies before making a decision.
Long Term Care Insurance
Purchasing a long-term care insurance policy can help offset the cost of caregiving for either in-home care (in some cases, even payouts for family caregivers) or care outside the home (e.g., adult daycare services, assisted living, memory care, nursing home). However, it’s important to understand the following about LTCi.
It can be quite expensive.
Premiums can range from $2,000 a year for a man in his 50s to more than $12,000 a year for a woman in her 70s. Furthermore, premiums increase annually until benefits begin (premiums cease while benefits are paid).
It may not cover the full cost of care.
Unless care is needed for only a few hours a day, long-term care policies generally do not cover the full cost of paid caregiving. For example, let’s say a policy pays $150 a day, but the owner needs care for eight hours a day. His in-home caregiver charges $30 an hour. That means his cost is $240 a day, so he’ll have to pay the additional $90 a day out of his own pocket. That’s
up to $2,790 a month or $32,850 a year. So, while LTCi can help defray the cost, someone who needs extensive care must have other assets to cover the rest of the cost. For an elderly person who needs 24-hour home care, the cost can be exponential.
Many new policies cover only a handful of years.
When you purchase an LTCi policy, you choose from various options that increase or decrease your premium. For example, coverage periods may range from two years to five years to life. You may also select a waiting period before coverage begins after purchase, which could range from 30 days to 365 days. The longer the wait period, the lower the premium. If you have an immediate need for coverage, you might be denied coverage altogether. That is why it’s best to purchase coverage when you are younger (50s) and presumably healthy.
You don’t get to choose when to start benefits.
LTCi coverage doesn’t kick in until you qualify, which generally means you are no longer able to independently conduct some or all of the prescribed daily living activities. The five primary qualifiers are bathing, going to the toilet, dressing yourself, feeding yourself, and the ability to move from bed to chair/wheelchair. Qualification to begin taking LTCi benefits usually requires physician verification.
The downside of a standalone LTCi policy is that it is a “use-it-or-lose-it” type of contract, much like auto or homeowner’s insurance. In other words, you may pay for it for decades but never actually use it, so all the premiums paid are lost.
Hybrid Life/Long Term Care Insurance
On the other hand, a hybrid insurance policy will pay out some portion of unused proceeds to beneficiaries upon the death of the policyowner. A hybrid policy is basically a life insurance policy with an LTCi rider or an accelerated benefit clause, which, either way, means it will cost more.
First and foremost, it works just like life insurance – once the owner passes away, the beneficiary receives a payout. However, if the owner needs money to pay for long-term care while he is still alive, he can tap the rider or life insurance payout to pay for the care. Then, when he passes away, his heirs receive any amount of the unused proceeds. With this type of policy, the owner doesn’t pay for LTCi coverage he does not need, but it’s available if he does need it.
Premiums for a hybrid policy, like any life insurance, depend on the age, gender, health, and amount of insurance proceeds desired, as well as any additional charge for the LTCi rider. Some policies include LTC benefits as a standard feature.
Employer-Sponsored Benefit
If your employer offers long-term care insurance as a voluntary benefit, it’s worth considering because group rates are generally cheaper than on the individual market. However, while employer-sponsored LTCi policies are usually portable – meaning you can keep paying for it after you leave your employer – your premiums may increase when no longer part of the group policy.
As always, reach out to a professional when it comes to planning for you and your family’s future care.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
America’s housing crisis has reached a breaking point. With median home prices soaring past $400,000, the National Association of Home Builders reports that 60 percent of U.S. households can’t even afford a $300,000 home. The math has become impossible for most American families.
While we often blame high mortgage rates, restrictive zoning laws and rising construction costs for the housing shortage, there’s another culprit hiding in plain sight: a decades-old tax rule that’s trapping millions of homeowners in houses they’d rather leave.
The $500,000 Problem
When Congress overhauled capital gains taxes on home sales in 1997, they created what seemed like a generous benefit: homeowners could exclude up to $250,000 in profits from taxes ($500,000 for married couples) when selling their primary residence. This replaced a complex system of rollovers and age-based exemptions with something simpler and cleaner.
But Congress made one critical mistake – they never adjusted these limits for inflation or housing price growth.
Nearly three decades later, these same dollar amounts remain frozen in time, even as home values have skyrocketed. According to new research from Moody’s Analytics, if the exclusion had kept pace with home prices, it would now stand at $885,000 for singles and $1,775,000 for couples. Even adjusting for general inflation alone would double today’s limits.
The Senior Squeeze
This outdated tax rule hits empty-nesters particularly hard. Consider this: nearly 6 million households headed by seniors live in homes larger than 2,500 square feet. Many would gladly downsize to something more manageable, but selling could trigger six-figure tax bills on homes they’ve owned for decades.
The result? They stay put, waiting until death when their heirs can inherit the property with a stepped-up basis that erases all capital gains. Meanwhile, these oversized homes remain off the market, unavailable to growing families who desperately need the space.
Moody’s Analytics estimates these “overhoused” seniors spend $3,000 to $5,000 more annually on maintenance, utilities and property taxes than they would in smaller homes – adding up to $20 billion to 30 billion in unnecessary costs nationwide each year.
An Unexpected Burden on the Middle Class
Surprisingly, this tax burden doesn’t primarily affect the wealthy. Middle-class homeowners in expensive markets like California and Massachusetts face steep tax bills despite modest incomes. Widows face their own challenges, having just two years after a spouse’s death to sell while maintaining the full $500,000 exclusion (though they do receive a partial step-up in basis on their late spouse’s share).
An IRS study revealed a startling fact: 20 percent to 25 percent of capital gains taxes collected under current rules come from filers earning less than $20,000 annually. Meanwhile, wealthier homeowners often have the resources and flexibility to structure sales strategically, minimizing their tax exposure.
The Housing Market Ripple Effect
This tax trap creates a cascade of problems. Young families remain stuck in starter homes. First-time buyers face even fiercer competition for limited inventory. Labor mobility suffers as workers can’t relocate to areas with better job opportunities. The entire housing ecosystem becomes frozen.
The shortage is stark: monthly active listings only climbed back above 1 million in May, according to realtor.com. Before the pandemic, that number hadn’t dropped below that threshold since at least 2016.
Solutions on the Table
Congress is considering two approaches to break this logjam. One would be to double the current exclusions and index them to inflation going forward. The more radical proposal would eliminate the cap entirely.
The Double-Edged Sword
Any change comes with risks. Moody’s Analytics warns that while updating these limits could unlock hundreds of thousands of homes and boost inventory, it might also intensify competition at the lower end of the market as downsizing seniors compete with first-time buyers for the same properties. It could also make housing an even more attractive tax shelter, which would ultimately drive prices higher.
The Path Forward
The paradox is clear: raising or eliminating the capital gains exclusion could provide immediate relief to millions of homeowners trapped by tax considerations. It could inject a much-needed supply into a starved market. But without careful implementation, it could just as easily fuel another round of price increases, leaving affordability as elusive as ever.
Alan F Burke CPA
The Hidden Tax Trap Keeping America’s Housing Market Frozen
November 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
America’s housing crisis has reached a breaking point. With median home prices soaring past $400,000, the National Association of Home Builders reports that 60 percent of U.S. households can’t even afford a $300,000 home. The math has become impossible for most American families.
While we often blame high mortgage rates, restrictive zoning laws and rising construction costs for the housing shortage, there’s another culprit hiding in plain sight: a decades-old tax rule that’s trapping millions of homeowners in houses they’d rather leave.
The $500,000 Problem
When Congress overhauled capital gains taxes on home sales in 1997, they created what seemed like a generous benefit: homeowners could exclude up to $250,000 in profits from taxes ($500,000 for married couples) when selling their primary residence. This replaced a complex system of rollovers and age-based exemptions with something simpler and cleaner.
But Congress made one critical mistake – they never adjusted these limits for inflation or housing price growth.
Nearly three decades later, these same dollar amounts remain frozen in time, even as home values have skyrocketed. According to new research from Moody’s Analytics, if the exclusion had kept pace with home prices, it would now stand at $885,000 for singles and $1,775,000 for couples. Even adjusting for general inflation alone would double today’s limits.
The Senior Squeeze
This outdated tax rule hits empty-nesters particularly hard. Consider this: nearly 6 million households headed by seniors live in homes larger than 2,500 square feet. Many would gladly downsize to something more manageable, but selling could trigger six-figure tax bills on homes they’ve owned for decades.
The result? They stay put, waiting until death when their heirs can inherit the property with a stepped-up basis that erases all capital gains. Meanwhile, these oversized homes remain off the market, unavailable to growing families who desperately need the space.
Moody’s Analytics estimates these “overhoused” seniors spend $3,000 to $5,000 more annually on maintenance, utilities and property taxes than they would in smaller homes – adding up to $20 billion to 30 billion in unnecessary costs nationwide each year.
An Unexpected Burden on the Middle Class
Surprisingly, this tax burden doesn’t primarily affect the wealthy. Middle-class homeowners in expensive markets like California and Massachusetts face steep tax bills despite modest incomes. Widows face their own challenges, having just two years after a spouse’s death to sell while maintaining the full $500,000 exclusion (though they do receive a partial step-up in basis on their late spouse’s share).
An IRS study revealed a startling fact: 20 percent to 25 percent of capital gains taxes collected under current rules come from filers earning less than $20,000 annually. Meanwhile, wealthier homeowners often have the resources and flexibility to structure sales strategically, minimizing their tax exposure.
The Housing Market Ripple Effect
This tax trap creates a cascade of problems. Young families remain stuck in starter homes. First-time buyers face even fiercer competition for limited inventory. Labor mobility suffers as workers can’t relocate to areas with better job opportunities. The entire housing ecosystem becomes frozen.
The shortage is stark: monthly active listings only climbed back above 1 million in May, according to realtor.com. Before the pandemic, that number hadn’t dropped below that threshold since at least 2016.
Solutions on the Table
Congress is considering two approaches to break this logjam. One would be to double the current exclusions and index them to inflation going forward. The more radical proposal would eliminate the cap entirely.
The Double-Edged Sword
Any change comes with risks. Moody’s Analytics warns that while updating these limits could unlock hundreds of thousands of homes and boost inventory, it might also intensify competition at the lower end of the market as downsizing seniors compete with first-time buyers for the same properties. It could also make housing an even more attractive tax shelter, which would ultimately drive prices higher.
The Path Forward
The paradox is clear: raising or eliminating the capital gains exclusion could provide immediate relief to millions of homeowners trapped by tax considerations. It could inject a much-needed supply into a starved market. But without careful implementation, it could just as easily fuel another round of price increases, leaving affordability as elusive as ever.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
According to the May 2019 Financial Stability Report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, there was more than $15 billion in outstanding commercial credit. While there are many ways companies can obtain funding, additional paid-in-capital (APIC) is one way to accomplish this goal.
In 2024, the median household income in the United States was $83,730. However, the national average annual cost of 24-hour paid long-term care (LTC) for a retiree age 65 and older was more than $125,000, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Moreover, one in five seniors will require care for more than five years.
America’s housing crisis has reached a breaking point. With median home prices soaring past $400,000, the National Association of Home Builders reports that 60 percent of U.S. households can’t even afford a $300,000 home. The math has become impossible for most American families.