The coming shakeup of the executive branch, along with Republican control of both houses of Congress, means tax changes are highly likely in 2025 and beyond. Positioning for new and amended tax provisions is already off to the races.
Regardless of the political landscape, on rare occasions, some measures have broad bipartisan support. One such bill is called the Methane Reduction and Economic Growth Act. It proposes adding a new credit for sequestering “qualified” methane from mining activities.
Looking Ahead To 2025
Proponents of the Methane Reduction and Economic Growth Act hope the tax credit will have a beneficial economic impact and create jobs. The idea is to capture and utilize the methane for productive industrial uses or as an alternative for heating buildings. The methane emitted by mines that qualify have long lifespans, with some abandoned mines emitting methane for up to 100 years. The long lifespan of the methane source is hoped to support the significant capital investment required to get the process up and running.
There is also significant potential for job creation in areas most impacted by the shutdown of coal-fired power plants, which in turn devastated the coal mining industry. The concept of using mine methane as an energy source could support rural American jobs.
Landscape and Potential for the Credit
There is a lot of mine methane to capture, with most not currently being captured. The U.S. government estimates abandoned coal mines produce about 237,000 metric tons annually. This methane has many potential uses, including hydrogen production.
Details on the New Subsection
The new section of 45Q credits would be based on the quantity of qualified methane that is sequestered. The captured methane must then be sent to the pipeline and used for producing heat or electricity. To be considered “qualified methane,” it must be captured from certain types of mines, including closed, abandoned, and surface mines. Finally, the methane captured must have otherwise been sent into the atmosphere if it had not been for the capture equipment activity.
Only qualified facilities may obtain the credit. Among other factors, the taxpayer needs to capture a minimum of 2,500 metric tons of methane each year to qualify. There are a lot more technical regulatory requirements related to the specific nature of methane capture, but those are beyond the scope of this article.
Conclusion
Typically, tax bills are split down the aisle based on political partisanship. This makes the passage of tax legislation difficult at best due to competing interests and a divided government. The tax credits related to methane capture, however, appear to be unusually bipartisan in nature. This is due to the unique intersection of democratic support from an environmental and climate perspective, meeting with Republican interest to support economic development in rural coal mining areas where the industry has been devastated. Put these two interests together, and you have the makings for a widely supported bipartisan bill that is very likely to pass.
Alan F Burke CPA
Energy Tax Credit Changes For 2025
December 1, 2024 · Blog, Guest Article of the Month
⏱ 3 min read
The coming shakeup of the executive branch, along with Republican control of both houses of Congress, means tax changes are highly likely in 2025 and beyond. Positioning for new and amended tax provisions is already off to the races.
Regardless of the political landscape, on rare occasions, some measures have broad bipartisan support. One such bill is called the Methane Reduction and Economic Growth Act. It proposes adding a new credit for sequestering “qualified” methane from mining activities.
Looking Ahead To 2025
Proponents of the Methane Reduction and Economic Growth Act hope the tax credit will have a beneficial economic impact and create jobs. The idea is to capture and utilize the methane for productive industrial uses or as an alternative for heating buildings. The methane emitted by mines that qualify have long lifespans, with some abandoned mines emitting methane for up to 100 years. The long lifespan of the methane source is hoped to support the significant capital investment required to get the process up and running.
There is also significant potential for job creation in areas most impacted by the shutdown of coal-fired power plants, which in turn devastated the coal mining industry. The concept of using mine methane as an energy source could support rural American jobs.
Landscape and Potential for the Credit
There is a lot of mine methane to capture, with most not currently being captured. The U.S. government estimates abandoned coal mines produce about 237,000 metric tons annually. This methane has many potential uses, including hydrogen production.
Details on the New Subsection
The new section of 45Q credits would be based on the quantity of qualified methane that is sequestered. The captured methane must then be sent to the pipeline and used for producing heat or electricity. To be considered “qualified methane,” it must be captured from certain types of mines, including closed, abandoned, and surface mines. Finally, the methane captured must have otherwise been sent into the atmosphere if it had not been for the capture equipment activity.
Only qualified facilities may obtain the credit. Among other factors, the taxpayer needs to capture a minimum of 2,500 metric tons of methane each year to qualify. There are a lot more technical regulatory requirements related to the specific nature of methane capture, but those are beyond the scope of this article.
Conclusion
Typically, tax bills are split down the aisle based on political partisanship. This makes the passage of tax legislation difficult at best due to competing interests and a divided government. The tax credits related to methane capture, however, appear to be unusually bipartisan in nature. This is due to the unique intersection of democratic support from an environmental and climate perspective, meeting with Republican interest to support economic development in rural coal mining areas where the industry has been devastated. Put these two interests together, and you have the makings for a widely supported bipartisan bill that is very likely to pass.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
All bills not enacted by the end of the 118th congressional session on Jan. 3, 2025, will expire.
Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 (HR 82) – This bill, with 330 bipartisan sponsors and a similar bill in the Senate, was introduced by Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA) on Jan. 9, 2023. It passed in the House on Nov. 12 of this year and is likely to pass in the Senate before the year’s end. The purpose of the bill is to eliminate the government pension offset that reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. In the private sector, this would have a similar effect to withholding Social Security from people who have a 401(k). The bill would also repeal provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for spouses and widows/ers who receive their own government pensions. The provisions of the bill would be retroactive to the beginning of 2024.
BOLIVAR Act (HR 825) – This legislation prohibits the head of an executive agency to enter into a contract for the procurement of goods or services with any person that has business operations with the Maduro regime in Venezuela. The act was introduced on Feb. 2, 2023, by Rep. Michael Waltz (R-OH). It passed in the House on Nov. 18, and its fate currently lies with the Senate.
Vote by Mail Tracking Act (HR 5658) – This bill would require mail-in ballots to use the Postal Service barcode and an Official Election Mail logo. It passed in the House on Nov. 18 and is under consideration in the Senate. The bill was introduced by Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) on Sept. 21, 2023.
Find and Protect Foster Youth Act (S 1146) – This act was introduced on March 30, 2023, by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). It would amend a provision of the Social Security Act to require the Department of Health and Human Services to eliminate obstacles to identifying and responding to reports of missing foster care children. Furthermore, it would assist in the assessment and screening of children who are at risk of becoming victims of sex trafficking, as well as identify best practices for effective interventions. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Nov. 18 and is currently in the Senate.
Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023 (S 1228) – This bill was introduced by Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) on April 25, 2023. The bill would require the director of the Office of Management and Budget to submit an annual report to Congress detailing projects that are over budget and behind schedule. This is a bipartisan bill that has passed in both the Senate and the House, but on July 22, the House made changes and sent it back to the Senate, where it currently resides.
Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2024 (S 275) – Introduced by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) on Feb. 7, 2023, this bill would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to vet applicants for funding of affordable broadband deployment in high-cost areas (including rural communities). The FCC would mandate a process, including a detailed proposal with technical capabilities to provide competitive awards for implementing the broadband network services. The FCC would then assess proposals in line with well-established technical standards. The bill passed the Senate on Sept. 25 and is currently with the House.
Alan F Burke CPA
Making Pensions Equitable, Protecting Foster Kids, Mail-in Votes and Tracking Government Spending
December 1, 2024 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 3 min read
All bills not enacted by the end of the 118th congressional session on Jan. 3, 2025, will expire.
Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 (HR 82) – This bill, with 330 bipartisan sponsors and a similar bill in the Senate, was introduced by Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA) on Jan. 9, 2023. It passed in the House on Nov. 12 of this year and is likely to pass in the Senate before the year’s end. The purpose of the bill is to eliminate the government pension offset that reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive other benefits, such as a pension from a state or local government. In the private sector, this would have a similar effect to withholding Social Security from people who have a 401(k). The bill would also repeal provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for spouses and widows/ers who receive their own government pensions. The provisions of the bill would be retroactive to the beginning of 2024.
BOLIVAR Act (HR 825) – This legislation prohibits the head of an executive agency to enter into a contract for the procurement of goods or services with any person that has business operations with the Maduro regime in Venezuela. The act was introduced on Feb. 2, 2023, by Rep. Michael Waltz (R-OH). It passed in the House on Nov. 18, and its fate currently lies with the Senate.
Vote by Mail Tracking Act (HR 5658) – This bill would require mail-in ballots to use the Postal Service barcode and an Official Election Mail logo. It passed in the House on Nov. 18 and is under consideration in the Senate. The bill was introduced by Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) on Sept. 21, 2023.
Find and Protect Foster Youth Act (S 1146) – This act was introduced on March 30, 2023, by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). It would amend a provision of the Social Security Act to require the Department of Health and Human Services to eliminate obstacles to identifying and responding to reports of missing foster care children. Furthermore, it would assist in the assessment and screening of children who are at risk of becoming victims of sex trafficking, as well as identify best practices for effective interventions. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Nov. 18 and is currently in the Senate.
Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023 (S 1228) – This bill was introduced by Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) on April 25, 2023. The bill would require the director of the Office of Management and Budget to submit an annual report to Congress detailing projects that are over budget and behind schedule. This is a bipartisan bill that has passed in both the Senate and the House, but on July 22, the House made changes and sent it back to the Senate, where it currently resides.
Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2024 (S 275) – Introduced by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) on Feb. 7, 2023, this bill would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to vet applicants for funding of affordable broadband deployment in high-cost areas (including rural communities). The FCC would mandate a process, including a detailed proposal with technical capabilities to provide competitive awards for implementing the broadband network services. The FCC would then assess proposals in line with well-established technical standards. The bill passed the Senate on Sept. 25 and is currently with the House.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Also known as greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, carbon accounting is a way for managers and analysts to measure a company’s total carbon emissions.
It’s a comprehensive approach to analyze how a company uses energy for its buildings, offices, conveyances and production processes. Carbon accounting examines firsthand, secondhand and tertiary energy uses.
Environmental, Social & Governance
Looking at ESG standards (Environmental, Social & Governance), it’s not only becoming encouraged, it’s becoming required for businesses, especially for publicly traded businesses. Whether it’s the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or other governmental agencies in the global economy, these administrative organizations are mandating emission declarations for businesses to account for their carbon emissions. It’s also necessary for third parties (lenders, potential and current investors) to review and analyze a company’s current and past performance, along with industry comparisons.
It’s important to distinguish the differences between carbon and GHG accounting. Carbon accounting only looks at carbon dioxide emissions, while GHG looks at the broader category and illustrates why doing so is important. Businesses look at nitrous oxide and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), for example, when accounting for GHGs. However, such measurement is based on the so-called carbon dioxide equivalent or C02e. This helps standardize GHGs into the C02e standard for carbon accounting, giving government and interested parties the ability to measure across a universal standard. Two common uses for this standard are for carbon offsets and credits.
Calculating Emissions
1. Scope 1 factors in emissions from the company’s directly controlled or owned assets. Examples include factories, production, conveyances, etc.
2. Scope 2 looks at what the business uses in regard to climate-controlled services for their factories, offices, etc. It also looks at the company’s contracts with power suppliers.
3. Scope 3 factors in indirect emissions the business may incur. This includes commercial commuting activities, investing, how assets are disposed of, etc.
According to the SEC, Scope 3 emissions must include those “upstream and downstream activities in a company’s value chain” if they’re necessary for investor consideration or if the business has pledged to meet certain metrics for Scope 3 levels.
From there, a business’ activity metrics are calculated according to governmental and industry standards, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ISO Standard 14064, or The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol, etc. Businesses’ results are presented against past results, where they discuss how they will improve their efficiency internally and work with their supply chain partners.
Compliance
While compliance is one important reason, third-party audiences, such as family offices, institutional money managers, lenders, etc., are equally as important. Asset managers and family offices, for example, look for ESG or environmentally friendly investments to attract retail or “smart-money” investors. Similarly, activist investors, especially those looking to make companies more environmentally friendly, can look at companies to see how their carbon emissions stack up against their industry and overall commercial peers.
Another consideration is that by meeting regulatory or industry requirements and meeting ESG standards, businesses could qualify for preferential or market rates for funding from the debt markets.
Conclusion
The more companies are well-versed in this type of accounting, the better they will meet government and investor expectations.
Alan F Burke CPA
Understanding Carbon Accounting
December 1, 2024 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 3 min read
Also known as greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, carbon accounting is a way for managers and analysts to measure a company’s total carbon emissions.
It’s a comprehensive approach to analyze how a company uses energy for its buildings, offices, conveyances and production processes. Carbon accounting examines firsthand, secondhand and tertiary energy uses.
Environmental, Social & Governance
Looking at ESG standards (Environmental, Social & Governance), it’s not only becoming encouraged, it’s becoming required for businesses, especially for publicly traded businesses. Whether it’s the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or other governmental agencies in the global economy, these administrative organizations are mandating emission declarations for businesses to account for their carbon emissions. It’s also necessary for third parties (lenders, potential and current investors) to review and analyze a company’s current and past performance, along with industry comparisons.
It’s important to distinguish the differences between carbon and GHG accounting. Carbon accounting only looks at carbon dioxide emissions, while GHG looks at the broader category and illustrates why doing so is important. Businesses look at nitrous oxide and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), for example, when accounting for GHGs. However, such measurement is based on the so-called carbon dioxide equivalent or C02e. This helps standardize GHGs into the C02e standard for carbon accounting, giving government and interested parties the ability to measure across a universal standard. Two common uses for this standard are for carbon offsets and credits.
Calculating Emissions
1. Scope 1 factors in emissions from the company’s directly controlled or owned assets. Examples include factories, production, conveyances, etc.
2. Scope 2 looks at what the business uses in regard to climate-controlled services for their factories, offices, etc. It also looks at the company’s contracts with power suppliers.
3. Scope 3 factors in indirect emissions the business may incur. This includes commercial commuting activities, investing, how assets are disposed of, etc.
According to the SEC, Scope 3 emissions must include those “upstream and downstream activities in a company’s value chain” if they’re necessary for investor consideration or if the business has pledged to meet certain metrics for Scope 3 levels.
From there, a business’ activity metrics are calculated according to governmental and industry standards, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ISO Standard 14064, or The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol, etc. Businesses’ results are presented against past results, where they discuss how they will improve their efficiency internally and work with their supply chain partners.
Compliance
While compliance is one important reason, third-party audiences, such as family offices, institutional money managers, lenders, etc., are equally as important. Asset managers and family offices, for example, look for ESG or environmentally friendly investments to attract retail or “smart-money” investors. Similarly, activist investors, especially those looking to make companies more environmentally friendly, can look at companies to see how their carbon emissions stack up against their industry and overall commercial peers.
Another consideration is that by meeting regulatory or industry requirements and meeting ESG standards, businesses could qualify for preferential or market rates for funding from the debt markets.
Conclusion
The more companies are well-versed in this type of accounting, the better they will meet government and investor expectations.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
The coming shakeup of the executive branch, along with Republican control of both houses of Congress, means tax changes are highly likely in 2025 and beyond. Positioning for new and amended tax provisions is already off to the races.
All bills not enacted by the end of the 118th congressional session on Jan. 3, 2025, will expire.
Also known as greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, carbon accounting is a way for managers and analysts to measure a company’s total carbon emissions.