Category: Accounting News

Based on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.

When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.  

If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.

Accounting Standards

Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).

One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.

With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.

Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing

To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.

Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).

Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:

$200,000 spent on R&D

$40,000 residual value

Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.

Conclusion

Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.

With the global digital payments market expected to see north of $20 trillion in transaction value in 2025, according to Statista, business-to-business transactions are undoubtedly going to see some action. Debit notes are one tool that businesses have to record their transactions and corresponding payments. Understanding what debit notes are and how they work is essential for a smooth transaction.

Defining Debit Notes

A debit note is a form that advises a vendor’s customer of any outstanding balances owed. It can either let the customer know of an upcoming invoice or advise them of an outstanding payment. Similarly, customers can use debit notes to document the return of goods that are damaged or otherwise unsatisfactory, including the projected credit for a future order.

Understanding Debit Note Uses

Debit notes are used between commercial entities through transactions that involve the supplier sending the customer goods before payment is made. Although the goods have physically moved and payment hasn’t been remitted until an invoice is sent and ultimately satisfied by the customer, a debit note communicates that the merchant has debited the customer’s ledger.

While it’s primarily used by companies that either produce goods or act as warehouse operators, if a business sublets some of its warehouse space, debit notes can communicate upcoming bills to its commercial tenants, even though it’s not its primary business. They can also be used by businesses to fix invoice mistakes. If overbilling has occurred, a debit note can be used to correct the imbalance.

These documents can provide a window for the customer to send back the goods before payment is submitted. It can be as simple as using a postcard to document the outstanding debt to the buyer. While it’s completely optional and only used by certain businesses, buyers can request one for their own record-keeping purposes. Usually used by commercial or business-to-business entities, a debit note (or credit note) is entered into the business’ accounting records to track amounts due.

It’s important to distinguish the differences between a debit note and a credit note. Debit notes add to the purchaser’s liability and inform the purchaser of their new debt to the vendor. In contrast, credit notes lower the buyer’s liability, permitting the buyer to know the scope and amount of the credit for damaged or unsatisfactory goods.

Another reason a debit note is issued is when an order is modified. Other circumstances might include if goods are damaged during production or in transit before inspection (conducted by the vendor); a buyer declines an order; there is a need to correct an order; or a credit note pays for the bill’s value.

Differences with an Invoice

While a debit note communicates the status of a future payment or adjustment to an order, invoices are more detailed. Invoices include the sales details, goods/services provided, individual unit prices, the complete cost, and the contact information for the seller and buyer.

Illustrating How It Works

Let’s say a business uses its credit line to buy 100,000 widgets from another company at an agreed-upon purchase price of $2 each. The supplier drops off the 100,000 widgets and remits the invoice for $200,000 to the business. However, the business received 20,000 widgets in unsatisfactory condition (damaged, etc.).

When this happens, the purchasing company creates a debit note and sends it to the supplier upon receipt of the damaged 20,000 widgets. This action will lead to an adjustment, debiting the amount owed of $40,000.

In this case, the transactions will be accounted for as follows:

n  Seller debits its accounts receivable by $40,000

n  Buyer will credit its accounts payable for $40,000

While this demonstrates how it works, it also shows that debit notes can be powerful tools for both buyers and sellers.

Conclusion

When it comes to debit notes, businesses and commercial customers of other businesses can leverage this tool to ensure they’re adjusting current and future orders.

Working capital is the difference between a business’ current assets and liabilities. Negative working capital can happen when a business’ current assets are below its current liabilities. Therefore, working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable. It’s a way to measure a company’s ability to meet short-term liabilities, such as managing inventory, satisfying vendor bills, etc., and how well its longer-term investments are implemented.

When a business has a surplus of current assets against its current liabilities, it’s said to have positive working capital. Generally speaking, when it’s positive, the business is able to service liabilities over the next 12 months, putting it in a good financial position. However, it’s important to understand how positive working capital is comprised. If a business has a sizeable outstanding accounts receivable account or has too much inventory, the company’s resources are not utilized efficiently. With money tied up in such areas and not financed by short-term liabilities, but with long-term capital, the long-term capital can’t be used for long-term investments.  

When working capital is either even or negative, it’s a way to gauge how (in)efficiently a business handles near-term financial obligations. Reasons why negative working capital exists include a business making one-time cash payments due to a business’ current assets markedly dropping. Similarly, current liabilities can increase massively with more accounts payable and increasing credit.

Delving into Negative Working Capital

When analyzing negative working capital, it’s important to see how it’s connected to the current ratio. The current ratio is a business’ current assets divided by its current liabilities. When the current ratio’s calculation is less than 1.0, the business has more current liabilities than current assets, resulting in negative working capital.

Temporary negative working capital may exist when a company spends excessively or sees a steep increase in outstanding bills due to buying input materials and services from its suppliers. Though extended periods of negative working capital could be a red flag because the business might have a problem paying immediate bills and is being forced to depend on financing or raising funds via equity issuances to manage its working capital, it gives insight into the company’s financial barometer.

Negative Working Capital Requires Judgment

Depending on the type of business and its working capital levels, a negative working capital figure may or may not indicate there’s a concern. Retail, grocery, and subscription negative working capital may not be bad; however, for capital-intensive companies, negative working capital might indicate trouble. One way to measure working-level capital is through the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC). The CCC determines whether negative working capital is from efficient operations or cash flow constraints.

It looks at:

1. Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) or how long the inventory waits before a sale is made.

2. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) or how long before an invoice is paid to the company.

3. Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) or how many days it takes a company to pay its vendors’ invoices.

Where: CCC = DIO + DSO – DPO

If the resulting number from the CCC is negative, it indicates the company is receiving payments from its customers well before it needs to pay vendors/suppliers. A company with this type of result is in good shape financially. However, if the CCC is positive and meets some of the criteria, it would require further investigation to see if the negative working capital is worrisome. Examples of a company’s poor operation include higher accounts payable days, turnover slows, falling revenue, and accounts receivable collection timeframes increasing.

Conclusion

When it comes to working capital, it requires analysis as to why a company’s working capital level is at the level it is. Taking the level at face value doesn’t give the evaluator the full picture.